A Post Hoc Analysis of Previously Untreated Patients (PUPs) With Severe Hemophilia A Who Developed Inhibitors in PUPs A-LONG

Manuel Carcao,Michele Schiavulli,Roshni Kulkarni,Pablo Rendo,Meredith C Foster,Elena Santagostino,Sandra Milena Casiano,Christoph Königs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011475
IF: 7.642
2024-01-29
Blood Advances
Abstract:Inhibitor development is a major therapeutic complication for people with hemophilia. The Phase 3 PUPs A-LONG study evaluated the safety and efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, herein referred to as rFVIIIFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A. Male PUPs <6 years were enrolled and received rFVIIIFc; inhibitor development was the primary endpoint. Post hoc analyses, including patient treatment regimen patterns and timing of inhibitor development, descriptive and Kaplan–Meier analyses of time to first inhibitor-positive test by treatment regimen and by titer, and consumption, were performed to describe subjects who developed inhibitors during PUPs A-LONG. We investigated patient characteristics (eg, demographics, genotype) and non-genetic risk factors (eg, intense factor exposure, central venous access device [CVAD] placement) that may predict inhibitor development and characteristics of inhibitor development (low-titer vs high-titer inhibitor). Baseline characteristics were similarly distributed for age, race, and ethnicity across both inhibitor-positive and inhibitor-negative subjects (all P >0.05). High-risk F8 variants were associated with development of high-titer inhibitors ( P =0.028). High-titer inhibitor development was often preceded by the presence of a low-titer inhibitor. Subjects whose low-titer inhibitor progressed to a high-titer inhibitor received a higher mean dose per infusion (98.4 IU/kg, n=5) compared with those whose low-titer inhibitor resolved spontaneously (59.2 IU/kg, n=7; P =0.033) or persisted (45.0 IU/kg, n=5; P =0.047). There was no association between CVAD placement surgery and inhibitor development. Post hoc analyses suggest that F8 genotype and dose of factor are important as inhibitor risk factors and require further investigation. NCT02234323
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?