Abstract:Objective To evaluate visual quality and pseudoaccommodation in patients after the implantation of an apodized diffractive aspherical multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL). Methods This was a prospective case series study. Thirty-five patients (50 eyes)who had agreed to undergo phacoemulsification and accept IOL implants were selected for the study. Any other eye disease or systemic disease was criteria for exclusion. The eyes were divided into 2 groups according to the type of IOL implanted. One group was implanted with apodized diffractive aspherical MIOL (AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD3) and the other group was implanted with apodized diffractive MIOL (AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3). Twenty-five eyes of 17 patients were implanted with SN6AD3 and 25 eyes of 18 patients were implanted with SN60D3. All patients were assessed 3 months postoperatively for aberrations of the crystalline lens, the modulation transfer function, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), pseudoaccommodation,contrast sensitivity and the rate of eyeglass removal for near. Data were compared using an independent samples t test and x2 test. Results UCDVA, BCDVA, UCNVA and DCNVA in the SN6AD3 group were not statistically different from the SN60D3 group (P＞0.05). There were statistical differences between the two groups when spherical, 4th-order higher aberrations and total higher-order aberrations were compared. The SN6AD3 group had lower aberrations than the SN60D3group under 3 and 5 mm pupils. There were statistical differences in the MTF for spatial frequencies of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 c/d. For these spatial frequencies, the SN6AD3 group had higher scores than the SN60D3 group. Accommodative range was (0.925±0.549)D in the SN6AD3 group and (0.964 ±0.582)D in the SN60D3 group. There were no statistically significant difference in accommodative range between the SN6AD3 and SN60D3 groups (t=0.217, P＞0.05). There were statistical differences in contrast sensitivity for spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12 and 18 c/d. At these spatial frequencies, the SN6AD3 group had better contrast sensitivity than the SN60D3 group. The rate of eyeglass removal for near for the two MIOL groups was 80% and 72% (x2=0.439, P=0.508).Conclusion The AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive aspherical MIOL provides excellent distance and near visual acuity, pseudoaccommodation and higher contrast sensitivity.

Comparative Assessment of Visual Quality after Combined Implantation of Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Comparative Assessment of Individualized Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation

A Study of the Amplitude of Pseudoaccommodation in Eyes after Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation

Reading Ability and Stereoacuity with Combined Implantation of Refractive and Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Comparative Analysis of Visual Quality Between Unilateral Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens and a Rotationally Asymmetric Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

Comparison of visual outcomes in patients with cataracts and high myopia after implantation of a zonal refractive multifocal or diffractive bifocal intraocular lens

Quality of Vision in Patients with Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation

Long-term Visual Performance of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Patients with Cataract and Myopia

Comparative analysis of visual quality after implantation of multifocal toric and monofocal toric intraocular lenses

Visual Performance with Accommodating and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Visual function after monocular implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal or single-piece monofocal intraocular lens Randomized prospective comparison

Short-term Evaluation of Visual Quality, Amplitude of Accommodation, and Stereoacuity Between Patients with Moderate-to-High Myopia Who Underwent ICLV4c Implantation and SMILE.

A Comparison of the Visual Performance of Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lenses and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses

The Comparison of Visual Quality Following Cataract Surgery with Aspheric and Spherical Intraocular Lens Implantation

Visual outcome and optical quality after implantation of zonal refractive multifocal and extended-range-of-vision IOLs: a prospective comparison

Comparison of visual quality between bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens implantation

Visual outcomes and optical quality after implantation of a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens

Analysis of contrast sensitivity and pseudoaccommodation in aspherical multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Visual function after aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses implantation

Wavefront aberration and accommodation power in eyes with aspheric multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Comparison of trifocal or hybrid multifocal-extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis