Laparoscopic Suture Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy for Uterine Prolapse

Zhi-qing Liang,Hui-cheng Xu,Yong Chen,Guang-wu Xiong,Qing Chang,Qiao-yu Zhang,Wei He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0529-567x.2004.10.006
2004-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate possibility and effect of laparoscopic suture uterosacral ligament hysteropexy or colpopexy for women with uterine prolapse.METHODS:Thirty-two women with symptomatic uterine prolapse underwent laparoscopic suture uterosacral ligament hysteropexy. At the laparoscopic suture hysteropexy or colpopexy, the pouch of Douglas was closed and the uterosacral ligaments were plicated and reattached to the cervix. All patients were multipara and menopausal with prolapse of anterior wall of vagina. Additionally, 4 patients were with prolapse of posterior wall of vagina, 15 with stress urinary incontinence, and 4 with myomas.RESULTS:All procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. The mean operating time for the laparoscopic suture hysteropexy or colpopexy alone was (32 +/- 11) min (range 20 approximately 80 min), and the mean blood loss was less than 50 ml. After a mean follow-up of (12 +/- 6) months (range 4 approximately 28 months), 23 women had no symptoms of uterine prolapse and seven had no objective evidence of uterine prolapse. Two women presented recurrence of uterine prolapse 3 months after operation.CONCLUSIONS:The laparoscopy suture hysteropexy or colpopexy is effective and safe in the management of symptomatic uterine prolapse. It may be an appropriate procedure for women with uterine prolapse hoping for uterine preservation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?