Abstract:Existing work indicates that the commonly used “single queue of runnable tasks” approach to scheduling shared memory multiprocessors can perform very poorly in a multiprogrammed parallel processing environment. A more promising approach is the class of “two-level schedulers” in which the operating system deals solely with allocating processors to jobs while the individual jobs themselves perform task dispatching on those processors. In this paper we compare two basic varieties of two-level schedulers. Those of the first type, static, make a single decision per job regarding the number of processors to allocate to it. Once the job has received its allocation, it is guaranteed to have exactly that number of processors available to it whenever it is active. The other class of two-level scheduler, dynamic, allows each job to acquire and release processors during its execution. By responding to the varying parallelism of the jobs, the dynamic scheduler promises higher processor utilizations at the cost of potentially greater scheduling overhead and more complicated application level task control policies. Our results, obtained via simulation, highlight the tradeoffs between the static and dynamic approaches. We investigate how the choice of policy is affected by the cost of switching a processor from one job to another. We show that for a wide range of plausible overhead values, dynamic scheduling is superior to static scheduling. Within the class of static schedulers, we show that, in most cases, a simple “run to completion” scheme is preferable to a round-robin approach. Finally, we investigate different techniques for tuning the allocation decisions required by the dynamic policies and quantify their effects on performance. We believe our results are directly applicable to many existing shared memory parallel computers, which for the most part currently employ a simple “single queue of tasks” extension of basic sequential machine schedulers. We plan to validate our results in future work through implementation and experimentation on such a system.

Statistical performance analysis of strict priority and generalised processor sharing two-stage scheduling system under exponentially bounded burstiness input model

Performance Bounds Analysis on Different Scheduling Algorithms for Networks with Self-Similar Traffic.

Scheduling Non-Preemptive Tasks with Strict Periods in Multi-Core Real-Time Systems

Schedulability Analysis of Non-Preemptive Strictly Periodic Tasks in Multi-Core Real-Time Systems

Opportunistic Scheduler Evaluation Using Discriminatory Processor Sharing Model

Schedulability of Strictly Periodic Tasks with Communication Dependence

Two-stage Flow Shop with a Batch Processor and Limited Buffer.

Application-Level Scheduling with Probabilistic Deadline Constraints

Design and Analysis of a Distributed Scheduling Algorithm with the Ability of Solving Bursty Traffic Load

Processor scheduling in shared memory multiprocessors

Performance Analysis Of The Priority Differentiated Double-Queue And Multiple-Server Communication System

Statistical Analysis of Link Scheduling on Long Paths

QoS Scheduling for NoCs: Strict Priority Queueing Versus Weighted Round Robin

Adaptive Priority Adjustment Scheduling Approach with Response-Time Analysis in Time-Sensitive Networks

Upper Bound Estimation of Job Deadline Missing Rate for Stochastic Soft Real-Time Systems

Scheduling for Periodic Multi-Source Systems with Peak-Age Violation Guarantees

Performance Analysis of a Heterogeneous Traffic Scheduler using Large Deviation Principle

Delay-Optimal Buffer-Aware Probabilistic Scheduling with Adaptive Transmission

Execution Allowance Based Fixed Priority Scheduling for Probabilistic Real-Time Systems

Schedulability analysis for Fault tolerance real-time system under fault bursts

Generalizing Fixed-Priority Scheduling for Better Schedulability in Mixed-Criticality Systems