How Much Can Riverine Biogeochemical Fluxes Affect the Arctic Ocean Acidification?

Yuanxin Zhang,Michiyo Yamamoto‐Kawai,Eiji Watanabe,Hotaek Park
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jc020404
2024-06-12
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Abstract:Arctic rivers carry not only large amounts of freshwater but also biogeochemical materials into the ocean and play important roles in Arctic ocean acidification (OA). This study quantitatively evaluated the effects of riverine biogeochemical fluxes (R‐BGC; carbon and nutrients) on the Arctic marine carbonate system and OA using multi‐decadal experiments (1979–2018) with a pan‐Arctic sea ice–ocean model. Improved initial and lateral boundary conditions of carbonate properties, observation‐based riverine biogeochemical data, and land model‐based interannually varying riverine freshwater discharge were adopted to enable more realistic experiments. The model simulated negative trends in aragonite saturation state (Ω) and pH in most regions of Arctic Ocean regardless of R‐BGC. The increased riverine freshwater promoted more OA through the higher dilution effect. Compared to the experiment with riverine discharge of only freshwater, the inclusion of R‐BGC caused positive anomalies in Ω and pH (by ∼0.14 and ∼0.03 in central basins, and by ∼0.15 and ∼0.06 in shelf seas, respectively). In the central basins, these anomalies were caused mostly by carbon (total alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon) of the R‐BGC. In the shelf seas, nutrient (nitrate and silicate) fluxes also contributed ∼14% and ∼32% of the anomalies owing to the enhanced primary production and a corresponding reduction in seawater pCO2. R‐BGC mitigated OA (ΔΩ = −1.53 × 10−3 year−1 and ΔpH = −0.56 × 10−3 year−1) in regions where riverine freshwater was accumulated (i.e., the Canada Basin, Chukchi Cap, Eurasian Basin, and East Siberian Sea). This study stressed the importance of including R‐BGC for OA model projection.
oceanography
What problem does this paper attempt to address?