Abstract:<p>Lithium-ion batteries are widely used in cleaner productions such as electric vehicles and energy storage systems, but the frequent occurrence of battery safety accidents also restrict their large-scale promotion and application. Fault diagnosis is critical for the safe operations of lithium-ion batteries, which has become an important function for battery management systems. Many types of fault diagnosis methods have been proposed for lithium batteries, however, the differences in parameter dimension and diagnosis strategy among diagnosis methods make it difficult to compare, resulting in the inability to choose the appropriate method in real applications. This paper proposes a standardized fault feature comparison method to quantitatively study the sensitivity and robustness of different fault diagnostic methods for lithium-ion batteries under different failure degrees, ambient temperatures, state of charges, and aging levels. The diagnostic methods based on battery model, sample entropy and correlation coefficient are constructed. Different degrees of short-circuit experiments under dynamic current conditions are used to prove the effectiveness of three diagnostic methods. The standardized fault feature comparison method is utilized to dequantize and standardize the fault signals, and then the diagnostic performance of three diagnostic methods is intuitively compared. Furthermore, the comparative conclusions of sensitivity and robustness of different methods are obtained, which prove that the selection of parameters and diagnostic thresholds in battery fault diagnostic methods needs to fully consider environmental conditions and battery status. Some methods need to clarify the usable range or make improvements under low temperature or large inconsistencies.</p>

A comparative study of sorting methods for Lithium-ion batteries

A Uniformity Sorting Strategy for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Impedance Spectroscopy

Study on Influence of Sorting Parameters to Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Life-Cycles Based on Cell Consistency

A new method for lithium-ion battery uniformity sorting based on internal criteria

Cell Sorting for Parallel Lithium-Ion Battery Systems: Evaluation Based on an Electric Circuit Model

Using Self Organizing Maps to Achieve Lithium-Ion Battery Cells Multi-Parameter Sorting Based on Principle Components Analysis

New technology in automobile power battery group assembly---According to method of volt-ampere characteristic curve of sorting batteries

A comparative study of fault diagnostic methods for lithium-ion batteries based on a standardized fault feature comparison method

Fast sorting method of retired batteries based on multi-feature extraction from partial charging segment

A Comparative Study of Equivalent Circuit Models for Li-ion Batteries

Experimental-Numerical Studies on Thermal Conductivity Anisotropy of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Analysis of Differences in Electrochemical Performance between Coin and Pouch Cells for Lithium‐Ion Battery Applications

A two-stage sorting method combining static and dynamic characteristics for retired lithium-ion battery echelon utilization

A novel sorting method for liquid metal batteries based on deep learning and sequential features

Towards Accurate and Efficient Sorting of Retired Lithium-ion Batteries: A Data Driven Based Electrode Aging Assessment Approach

Comparative Study of the Electrochemical Performance of Different Separators in Aprotic Li–O 2 Batteries

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy characterization and parameterization of lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide pouch cells: dependency analysis of temperature and state of charge

Temperature Percormance Comparative Analysis Of Different Power Batteries

A Novel Grouping Method for Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries Based on a Fractional Joint Kalman Filter and a New Modified K-Means Clustering Algorithm

Comparative Study on the Electrochemical Properties of Cylindrical and Pouch-Type Lithium Ion Battery

Comparative Study of the Electrochemical Performance of Different Separators in Aprotic Li–O2 Batteries