Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy, safety of patient-tailored 3D printed brace in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients treated with two different types of brace. Materials and Methods From September 2017 to August 2020, 103 AIS patients requiring non-operative management were prospectively recruited in this study. All patients were followed up every 6 months, clinical and radiological examination were assessed at each follow-up time. Full-length anteroposterior X-ray of the spine in the standing position was performed obtained. At the last follow-up, each patient completed a standardized HRQoL questionnaire. Compliance is defined as that the patient insists on wearing the brace for ≥ 23h every day (full-time wearing) and follow-up every 6 months until bone maturity.The rate of major curve Cobb progression was defined that maximum Cobb Angle of major curve greater than 6° compared with that at the initial diagnosis, or aggravated to more than 45° so that orthopedic surgery was recommended during treatment, which was defined as the rate of conversion to surgery. The effects of these two types of braces on the rate of major curve Cobb progression and HRQoL were analyzed by independent sample t-test ad Chi-square test. Results The thickness was 4 mm for thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) and 3 mm for 3D-printed brace (3DPB). In addition, compared with the material used in TLSO, the weight (600-800 grams) of the 3DPB materials with the same area is reduced by about 25-30%. 55 patients (49.1%) and 48 patients (33.1%) were respectively included in the 3DPB cohort and the TLSO cohort.The maximum Cobb angle of major curve in the 3DPB cohort was significantly lower than those in the TLSO cohort at 6 months, 12 months and the last follow-up (p < 0.01). The thoracic kyphosis (TK) and lumbar lordosis (LL) of the two cohorts at the last follow-up were lower than those before brace treatment, in addition, there was a significant difference in TK (p = 0.001) and LL (p = 0.004) between the two cohorts at the follow-up. The scores of physical function, pain, self-image, mental health and treatment satisfaction in the Chinese version of SRS-22 in the 3DPB cohort were higher than those in the TLSO cohort (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). The scores of the 3DPB cohort were significantly higher than those of the TLSO group in the four dimensions (p = 0.008, 0.013, 0.015, and 0.002, respectively) of the EuroQol-5D health description system except for mobility, and the overall health status of EuroQol-5D was higher for the 3DPB cohort (p < 0.001). At the last follow-up, One patient in the 3DPB cohort and ten patients in the TLSO cohort had major curve Cobb progression of greater than 6°, and the rate of major curve Cobb progression in 3DPB cohort was significantly lower than that in the TLSO cohort (OR 14.2, 95% CI 1.7∼115.8, p < 0.01). One patient in the 3DPB and seven patients in the TLSO cohorts received subsequent surgery or was recommended for surgery, and the rate of conversion to surgery was significantly lower than in the 3DPB cohort (OR 9.2, 95% CI 1.1∼77.9, p < 0.05). Conclusions Patient-tailored 3D-printed brace is lighter, thinner, and more comfortable than conventional braces in the treatment of AIS. It can substantially improve the HRQoL of patients and can significantly reduce the progression of major curve Cobb progression and rate of conversion of surgery.

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on the Treatment Outcome of Spinecor Brace Versus Rigid Brace for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Follow-Up According to the Srs Standardized Criteria

3d-Printed Brace In The Treatment Of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Study Protocol Of A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial

Patient-specific 3D-printed Brace for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Cohort Study

Clinical Efficacy Study of Schroth Exercise Combined with Orthotic Treatment of Different Wearing Times in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis—A Randomized Controlled Trial

Optimized braces for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A study protocol of a prospective randomised controlled trial

A Retrospective Controlled Study from a Prospective Cohort

Bracing in adult with scoliosis: experience in diagnosis and classification from a 15 year prospective study of 739 patients

The Comparison of Posterior Intervertebral Release Combined with Posterior Column Osteotomy and Posterior Column Osteotomy Alone for the Treatment of Moderate‐to‐Severe Rigid Scoliosis: A Prospective Controlled Study

Comparison of the efficacy of thoracolumbosacral and lumbosacral orthosis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in patients with major thoracolumbar or lumbar curves: a prospective controlled study

[The Role of Initial Bone Mineral Status in Predicting the Early Outcome of Brace Treatment in Girls with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis].

Clinical Outcomes of Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

The superiority of Schroth exercise combined brace treatment for mild to moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Effect of adding Schroth physiotherapeutic scoliosis specific exercises to standard care in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis on posture assessed using surface topography: A secondary analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

Which Interventions May Improve Bracing Compliance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Curve Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With a Minimum of 2 Years' Follow-up After Completed Brace Weaning With Reference to the SRS Standardized Criteria.

Comparison of Thoracoscopic Anterior Release Combined With Posterior Spinal Fusion Versus Posterior-only Approach With an All-pedicle Screw Construct in the Treatment of Rigid Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Does Brace Treatment Impact Upon the Flexibility and the Correctability of Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescents?

Brace Treatment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with Curve Between 40° and 45°: Effectiveness and Related Factors

Results of bracing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the context of clinical practice and the Scoliosis Research Society's criteria: 5-year observational study from a German orthopaedic university hospital

The influence of elastic orthotic belt on sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis: a comparative radiographic study with Milwaukee brace

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomised trial protocol comparing clinical and radiological outcomes in minimally invasive surgery versus standard posterior spinal fusion in a single-centre, the Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy