Management of Scar Contractures of the Hand—Our Therapeutic Strategy and Challenges

Hoyu Cho,Shimpei Ono,Kevin C. Chung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051516

IF: 3.9

2024-03-07

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:The essence of treating scar contractures lies in covering the skin deficit after releasing the contractures, typically using flaps or skin grafts. However, the specific characteristics of scar contractures, such as their location, shape, and size, vary among patients, which makes surgical planning challenging. To achieve excellent outcomes in the treatment of scar contractures, we have developed a dimensional classification system for these contractures. This system categorizes them into four types: type 1 (superficial linear), type 2-d (deep linear), type 2-s (planar scar contractures confined to the superficial layer), and type 3 (planar scar contractures that reach the deep layer, i.e., three-dimensional scar contractures). Additionally, three factors should be considered when determining surgical approaches: the size of the defect, the availability of healthy skin around the defect, and the blood circulation in the defect bed. Type 1 and type 2-d are linear scars; thus, the scar is excised and sutured in a straight line, and the contracture is released using z-plasty or its modified methods. For type 2-s, after releasing the scar contracture band, local flaps are indicated for small defects, pedicled perforator flaps for medium defects, and free flaps and distant flaps for large defects. Type 2-s has good blood circulation in the defect bed, so full-thickness skin grafting is also a suitable option regardless of the defect's size. In type 3, releasing the deep scar contracture will expose important structures with poor blood circulation, such as tendons, joints, and bones. Thus, a surgical plan using flaps, rather than skin grafts, is recommended. A severity classification and treatment strategy for scar contractures have not yet been established. By objectively classifying and quantifying scar contractures, we believe that better treatment outcomes can be achieved.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper mainly discusses the management strategies and challenges of hand scar contracture. The authors propose a dimension-based classification system to categorize these contractures in order to help choose the best treatment plan. The paper mentions that the main issue with scar contracture is the skin defect, which usually requires repair through flaps or skin grafts. However, surgical planning becomes complicated due to the varying scar positions, shapes, and sizes in each patient.

The paper first introduces the differences between scar contracture and joint contracture, and presents two key checkpoints for evaluating scar contracture. Subsequently, the paper discusses surgical indications and timing, emphasizing the importance of early joint mobility exercises and preventive measures. Regarding treatment strategies for scar contracture, the authors suggest selecting the treatment method based on the size of the defect, availability of surrounding healthy skin, and blood flow condition of the defect bed, including simple suturing, Z-plasty, local flaps, pedicled perforator flaps, or free flaps.

Furthermore, the paper proposes a four-class classification system (Type 1: superficial linear, Type 2-d: deep linear, Type 2-s: superficial limited plane scar contracture, Type 3: deep plane scar contracture) to guide surgical decision-making. Different surgical methods are chosen based on the depth and extent of the scar, aiming to improve treatment outcomes through objective classification and quantification.