Abstract:INTRODUCTION Many of the procedures for estimating and assessing causal effects under unconfoundedness involve the propensity score. In practice it is rare that we know the propensity score a priori in settings other than those involving randomized experiments. Such practical settings could have complex designs where the unit-level probabilities differ in known ways. An example is the allocation of admissions to students applying for medical school in The Netherlands in the 1980s and 1990s. Based on high school grades, applicants would be assigned a priority score that determined their probability of getting admitted to medical school. The actual admission to medical school was then based on a (random) lottery. Such settings are rare, however, and a more common situation is where, given the pre-treatment variables available, a researcher views unconfoundedness as a reasonable approximation to the actual assignment mechanism, with only vague a priori information about the form of the dependence of the propensity score on the observed pre-treatment variables. For example, in many medical settings, decisions are based on a set of clinically relevant patient characteristics observed by doctors and entered in patients’ medical records. However, there is typically no explicit rule that requires physicians to choose a specific treatment based on particular values of the pre-treatment variables. In light of this degree of physician discretion, there is no explicitly known form for the propensity score. In such cases, for at least some of the methods for estimating and assessing treatment effects discussed in this part of the book, the researcher needs to estimate the propensity score. In this chapter we discuss some specific methods for doing so. It is important to note that the various methods that will be discussed in the chapters following this one, specifically Chapters 14–17, use the propensity score in different ways. Some of these methods rely more heavily than others on an accurate approximation of the true propensity score by the estimated propensity score.

Treatment effect estimation using the propensity score in clinical trials with historical control

Using Propensity Scores to Estimate Effects of Treatment Initiation Decisions: State of the Science

Comparing Propensity Score-Based Methods in Estimating the Treatment Effects: A Simulation Study

Theory and practice of propensity score analysis

Propensity score analysis for time-dependent exposure

Propensity Score Methods for Creating Covariate Balance in Observational Studies

Propensity Score Method: a Non-Parametric Technique to Reduce Model Dependence

Estimating and Using Propensity Scores with Partially Missing Data

Adaptive Hybrid Control Design for Comparative Clinical Trials with Historical Control Data

Propensity Score Analysis with Guaranteed Subgroup Balance

Propensity Score Methods in Health Technology Assessment: Principles, Extended Applications, and Recent Advances

BASIC: A Bayesian Adaptive Synthetic-Control Design for Phase II Clinical Trials.

Applying Propensity Score Methods in Clinical Research in Neurology

Use of Propensity Scoring and Its Application to Real‐World Data: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Methodological Objectives Explained to Researchers Without Using Mathematical Equations

Recent Development Of Propensity Score Methods In Observational Studies: Multi-Categorical Treatment, Causal Mediation, And Heterogeneity

The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

A practical guide to estimating treatment effects in patients with rheumatic diseases using real-world data

[Application of Propensity Score Matching in the Design of an Epidemiological Study].

Estimating the Propensity Score

Robust nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects: A propensity score‐based varying coefficient approach

Estimation of Average Treatment Effect Based on a Multi-Index Propensity Score.