A practical guide to estimating treatment effects in patients with rheumatic diseases using real-world data

Are Hugo Pripp,Katarzyna Łosińska,Mariusz Korkosz,Glenn Haugeberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05597-2

2024-04-24

Rheumatology International

Abstract:Abstract Objective Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard in study methodology. However, due to their study design and inclusion criteria, these studies may not capture the heterogeneity of real-world patient populations. In contrast, the lack of randomization and the presence of both measured and unmeasured confounding factors could bias the estimated treatment effect when using observational data. While causal inference methods allow for the estimation of treatment effects, their mathematical complexity may hinder their application in clinical research. Methods We present a practical, nontechnical guide using a common statistical package (Stata) and a motivational simulated dataset that mirrors real-world observational data from patients with rheumatic diseases. We demonstrate regression analysis, regression adjustment, inverse-probability weighting, propensity score (PS) matching and two robust estimation methods. Results Although the methods applied to control for confounding factors produced similar results, the commonly used one-to-one PS matching method could yield biased results if not thoroughly assessed. Conclusion The guide we propose aims to facilitate the use of readily available methods in a common statistical package. It may contribute to robust and transparent epidemiological and statistical methods, thereby enhancing effectiveness research using observational data in rheumatology.

rheumatology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the challenges encountered when using real-world data to evaluate treatment effects in rheumatology. Specifically, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard in research methods, but due to their strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, these trials may not adequately reflect the heterogeneity of real-world patient populations. On the other hand, observational studies can better represent real-world patient conditions but lack randomization and have known and unknown confounding factors, which may lead to biased estimates of treatment effects.

The main objective of the paper is to provide a practical guide by demonstrating several methods for estimating treatment effects using common statistical software packages (such as Stata) and simulated real-world datasets. These methods include regression analysis, regression adjustment, inverse-probability weighting, propensity score matching, and two robust estimation methods. These methods aim to control for the influence of confounding factors and improve the effectiveness and transparency of clinical research using observational data. Additionally, the paper discusses the application of causal inference methods in rheumatology research and emphasizes the importance of these methods in handling real-world data.