Eye movements as a tool to investigate exemplar retrieval in judgments

Agnes Rosner,Fabienne Brändli,Bettina von Helversen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.3

2024-01-01

Judgment and decision making

Abstract:Abstract The retrieval of past instances stored in memory can guide inferential choices and judgments. Yet, little process-level evidence exists that would allow a similar conclusion for preferential judgments. Recent research suggests that eye movements can trace information search in memory. During retrieval, people gaze at spatial locations associated with relevant information, even if the information is no longer present (the so-called ‘looking-at-nothing’ behavior). We examined eye movements based on the looking-at-nothing behavior to explore memory retrieval in inferential and preferential judgments. In Experiment 1, participants assessed their preference for smoothies with different ingredients, while the other half gauged another person’s preference. In Experiment 2, all participants made preferential judgments with or without instructions to respond as consistently as possible. People looked at exemplar locations in both inferential and preferential judgments, and both with and without consistency instructions. Eye movements to similar training exemplars predicted test judgments but not eye movements to dissimilar exemplars. These results suggest that people retrieve exemplar information in preferential judgments but that retrieval processes are not the sole determinant of judgments.

psychology, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is whether, in preferential judgments, people form judgments by retrieving exemplars from memory, similar to inferential judgments. Specifically, the authors aim to explore whether people retrieve exemplar information from memory in both preferential and inferential judgments by studying eye movements, particularly the "looking-at-nothing" behavior.

### Background and Motivation
1. **The Role of Memory in Judgments**:
- Past exemplars in memory can guide inferential choices and judgments.
- However, there is little research on whether similar process-level evidence exists in preferential judgments.

2. **Eye Movements as a Research Tool**:
- Recent studies suggest that eye movements can track the process of searching for information in memory.
- During retrieval, people look at the spatial locations associated with relevant information, even if that information is no longer present (i.e., "looking-at-nothing" behavior).

### Research Objectives
- **Experiment 1**: Participants evaluate their preference for different milkshake ingredients, with half evaluating their own preferences and the other half evaluating someone else's preferences.
- **Experiment 2**: All participants make preferential judgments, with some being instructed to answer as consistently as possible.

### Main Findings
- People look at exemplar locations in both inferential and preferential judgments, regardless of consistency instructions.
- Eye movements to similar training exemplars can predict test judgments, but eye movements to dissimilar exemplars cannot.
- These results suggest that people do retrieve exemplar information in preferential judgments, but the retrieval process is not the sole determinant of the judgment.

### Conclusion
- The study provides direct evidence that people retrieve exemplar information from memory in preferential judgments.
- However, the retrieval process is not the only basis for judgments; other factors such as rules or prior attitudes may also be involved.

Through these studies, the authors hope to better understand the role of memory retrieval in preferential judgments and provide new perspectives for future research.