Abstract:Information stored in the memory system can affect visual search process. Foreknowing features of distractors could facilitate target selection. Previous studies found that after sufficient practice, participants learned to ignore fixed feature representations in working memory (WM) when they reappeared as distractors. However, varied WM representations would automatically capture attention, suggesting that we could not voluntarily inhibit varied WM representations. Current studies investigated whether active-maintained varied representations could be suppressed as those fixed representations. In study 1, participants were requested to find a specific shape (target) in the search array and indicate the location of a dot inside the target. The fixed color-cue in each trial indicated that target would not be among shapes in the cued color. Meanwhile, there was a constant color, which would never be the target (and never appeared as cue color) during the entire experiment. In negative-cue condition, distractor color in search array was the cue color, while the target color was randomly selected. In constant color condition, distractor color was the constant color which was a long-term memory (LTM) representation. In neutral condition, both target color and distractor color were randomly selected with the restriction that they would never be the cue color nor the constant color. We found that, compared to neutral conditions, both fixed WM representations and LTM representations could facilitate visual search. In study 2, we varied the cue in each trial. Results showed that reaction time (RT) of negative-cue condition was significantly shorter than neutral condition when reaction speed was slow. Importantly, even in fast RT condition, there was no capture effect. In all, our results indicated that participants could voluntarily suppress both fixed and varied WM representations when they reappeared as distractors. However, facilitation of varied representation only happened when cognitive control process had sufficient time to execute.

Long-term memory and hippocampal function support predictive gaze control during goal-directed search

Visual Search May Not Require Target Representation in Working Memory or Long-Term Memory.

The impact of aging and repetition on eye movements and recognition memory

Seeing the Future: Anticipatory Eye Gaze as a Marker of Memory

Gaze patterns reflect the retrieval and selection of memories in a context-dependent object location retrieval task

Remembrance with gazes passed: Eye movements precede continuous recall of episodic details of real-life events

How do eyes and brain search a randomly structured uninformative scene? Exploiting a basic interplay of attention and memory

Active inhibition and memory promote exploration and search of natural scenes

Knowing where to go: Spatial memory guides eye and body movements in a naturalistic visual search task

Contralateral delay activity and alpha lateralization reflect retinotopic and screen-centered reference frames in visual memory

The contributions of eye gaze fixations and target-lure similarity to behavioral and fMRI indices of pattern separation and pattern completion

Visual search in Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: An eye-tracking study

After-search--visual search by gaze shifts after input image vanishes.

Environmental regularities mitigate attentional misguidance in contextual cueing of visual search.

Precise Timing Matters: Modulating Human Memory by Synchronizing Hippocampal Stimulation to Saccadic Event Related Potentials

Eye and head movements in visual search in the extended field of view

Monitoring Eye Movements to Investigate the Picture Superiority Effect in Spatial Memory

Gaze biases can reflect task-specific spatial memorization strategies

Eye tracking evidence for the reinstatement of emotionally negative and neutral memories

Attention-based rehearsal: Eye movements reveal how visuospatial information is maintained in working memory.

Memory-based Attentional Guidance Facilitates Visual Search Through Distractor Suppression