Abstract:In order to be able to accurately assess the Human Error Probability (HEP) of high-speed rail train dispatchers. A HEP quantitative evaluation model based on Improved Weighted Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis (CREAM) was constructed, which corrected the shortcomings of traditional CREMA. Using bipolar 2-tuples as the Common Performance Condition (CPC) evaluation linguistics, the subjective and objective weights of CPC are calculated through the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Criteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC), and then the combined weighting method is used to further obtain the comprehensive weight of CPC; At the same time, the idea of group decision-making is used to reduce the subjectivity of CPC evaluation, and the weight of experts is calculated by using the adaptive dynamic weight adjustment method of grey correlation degree; on the basis of obtaining CPC and expert weights, the evaluation value of CPC is calculated. The weighted operation then obtains the Context Influence Index (CII) value; finally, the quantitative calculation of HEP is obtained by using the CII value. The model is validated by taking the high-speed train dispatcher's normal and abnormal train reception as examples. The research results show that: under normal conditions, the HEP of high-speed rail train dispatchers is 9.1586.10-5, and under abnormal conditions, the HEP of highspeed rail train dispatchers is 2.1189.10-3. Under abnormal circumstances, the human error probability of high-speed train dispatchers is more than 20 times that under normal circumstances. At the same time, compared with other methods, the model has certain advantages in terms of weight sensitivity, data utilization sufficiency, and model solution domain. The improved CREAM model can better reflect the impact of different CPCs on high-speed rail train dispatchers, and can provide a calculation method for the HEP quantification of high-speed rail train dispatchers.

The Method to Quantify Human Error Probability in Probabilistic Cognitive Control Mode

Quantification of Human Error Probability of CREAM in Cognitive Control Mode

A human error probability quantification method based on CREAM+Bayes

Improving Probability Estimation Through Active Probabilistic Model Learning.

Determination of Control Modes in CREAM Method Based on Fuzzy Logic

Estimating Human Error Probability using a modified CREAM

A human reliability analysis method based on CREAM and uncertain reasoning

Human error probability quantification method based on Bayesian information fusion

Engineering Approach for Human Error Probability Quantification

Review on the Quantification Methods of Human Error Probability

Research on Quantitative Evaluation Model of Human Error Probability of High-Speed Railway Train Dispatchers

An Integrated CREAM for Human Reliability Analysis Based on Consensus Reaching Process under Probabilistic Linguistic Environment

Quantitative Analysis of Error Mode, Error Effect and Criticality

A Human Error Probability Quantification Method Based on SRK Framewok

New improved CREAM model for human reliability analysis using a linguistic D number-based hybrid decision making approach

An improved weighted fuzzy CREAM model for quantifying human reliability in subway construction: Modeling, validation, and application

Development and Application for Quantification of Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method

Qualitative Correlation Analysis Between Performance Shaping Factors and Human Error Mode

Human reliability analysis of offshore high integrity pressure protection system based on improved CREAM and HCR integration method

An HFM‐CREAM model for the assessment of human reliability and quantification

Driver Behavior Failure Probability Prediction Based on CREAM