Abstract:OBJECTIVE Despite the widespread use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD), the exact anatomical target responsible for the therapeutic effect is still a subject of research. Intraoperative stimulation tests by experts consist of performing passive movements of the patient's arm or wrist while the amplitude of the stimulation current is increased. At each position, the amplitude that best alleviates rigidity is identified. Intrarater and interrater variations due to the subjective and semiquantitative nature of such evaluations have been reported. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of an acceleration sensor attached to the evaluator's wrist to assess the change in rigidity, hypothesizing that such a change will alter the speed of the passive movements. Furthermore, the combined analysis of such quantitative results with anatomy would generate a more reproducible description of the most effective stimulation sites. METHODS To test the reliability of the method, it was applied during postoperative follow-up examinations of 3 patients. To study the feasibility of intraoperative use, it was used during 9 bilateral DBS operations in patients suffering from PD. Changes in rigidity were calculated by extracting relevant outcome measures from the accelerometer data. These values were used to identify rigidity-suppressing stimulation current amplitudes, which were statistically compared with the amplitudes identified by the neurologist. Positions for the chronic DBS lead implantation that would have been chosen based on the acceleration data were compared with clinical choices. The data were also analyzed with respect to the anatomical location of the stimulating electrode. RESULTS Outcome measures extracted from the accelerometer data were reproducible for the same evaluator, thus providing a reliable assessment of rigidity changes during intraoperative stimulation tests. Of the 188 stimulation sites analyzed, the number of sites where rigidity-suppressing amplitudes were found increased from 144 to 170 when the accelerometer evaluations were considered. In general, rigidity release could be observed at significantly lower amplitudes with accelerometer evaluation (mean 0.9 ± 0.6 mA) than with subjective evaluation (mean 1.4 ± 0.6 mA) (p < 0.001). Of 14 choices for the implant location of the DBS lead, only 2 were the same for acceleration-based and subjective evaluations. The comparison across anatomical locations showed that stimulation in the fields of Forel ameliorates rigidity at similar amplitudes as stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus, but with fewer side effects. CONCLUSIONS This article describes and validates a new assistive method for assessing rigidity with acceleration sensors during intraoperative stimulation tests in DBS procedures. The initial results indicate that the proposed method may be a clinically useful aid for optimal DBS lead placement as well as a new tool in the ongoing scientific search for the optimal DBS target for PD.

Reliability evaluation and improvement of deep brain stimulator based on accelerated flexing test

Reliability Evaluation of an Implantable Deep Brain Stimulator

A Study of Mechanical Optimization Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Based on an Electromechanical Model

An Experimental Study of Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Fracture: Possible Fatigue Mechanisms and Prevention Approach.

Development Of A Non-Invasive Deep Brain Stimulator With Precise Positioning And Real-Time Monitoring Of Bioimpedance

Mechanics Strategies for Implantation of Flexible Neural Probes

The Study on a Real-Time Remote Monitoring System for Parkinson's Disease Patients with Deep Brain Stimulators

A novel assistive method for rigidity evaluation during deep brain stimulation surgery using acceleration sensors

Design and Testing of a Novel, Low-Cost, Low-Voltage, Functional Electrical Stimulator

Patient Perspectives on the Efficacy of a New Kind of Rechargeable Deep Brain Stimulators1

Study of a New Electromagnetism Stimulation Method in Deep Brain

Fatigue Test of Helical Nervous Electrodes and Weak Point Analysis of Helical Nervous Electrodes Design.

Lead Fixation in Deep Brain Stimulation: Comparison of Three Lead Anchoring Devices in China.

Ultraflexible Neural Electrodes Enabled Synchronized Long-Term Dopamine Detection and Wideband Chronic Recording Deep in Brain

[Development of a flexible embedded neurostimulator for animal robots].

Primary Experimental Study on Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation in Rf Electromagnetic Field

A Removable Insertion Shuttle for Ultraflexible Neural Probe Implantation with Stable Chronic Brain Electrophysiological Recording

[Advances in Application of Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment of Neuropsychological Diseases].

Stimulation of microelectrode to deep brain regions: Simulation analysis using ANSYS software

Designing and pilot testing a novel high-definition transcranial burst electrostimulation device for neurorehabilitation

Revolutionizing motor dysfunction treatment: A novel closed-loop electrical stimulator guided by multiple motor tasks with predictive control