Abstract:Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods are playing an increasingly important role in the pricing of complex financial derivatives. For models in which the prices of the underlying assets are driven by Brownian motions, the performance of QMC methods is known to depend crucially on the construction of Brownian motions. This paper focuses on the impact of various constructions. Although the Brownian bridge (BB) construction often yields very good results, as Papageorgiou pointed out, there are financial derivatives for which the BB construction performs badly [Papageorgiou, A. 2002. The Brownian bridge does not offer a consistent advantage in quasi-Monte Carlo integration. J. Complexity18(1) 171--186]. In this paper we first extend Papageorgiou's analysis to establish an equivalence principle: if the BB construction (or any other construction) is the preferred construction for a particular financial derivative, then for any other construction, there is another financial derivative for which the latter construction is the preferred one. In this sense, all methods of construction are equivalent and no method is consistently superior to others; it all depends on the particular financial derivative. We then show how to find a good construction for a particular class of financial derivatives. In practice, our strategy is to find a good construction for an “easy” problem and then apply it to more complicated problems related to the easy one. This strategy is applied to the arithmetic Asian options (including Bermudan Asian options) based on the weighted average of the stock prices. We do this by studying a simpler problem, namely, the geometric Asian option, for which the best construction is easily available, and applying it to the arithmetic Asian option. Numerical experiments confirm the success of this strategy: whereas in QMC all the common methods (the standard method, BB, and principal component analysis) may lose their power in some situations, the new method behaves very well in all cases. Further large variance reduction can be achieved in combination with a control variate. The new method can be interpreted as a practical way of reducing the effective dimension for some class of functions.

Application of MCMC algorithm in interest rate modeling

Multivariate Regime Switching Model Estimation and Asset Allocation

Bayesian Estimation of CIR Model

A Fast and Efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Market Microstructure Model

A Nonparametric GMM Series Approach to Solving Multi-equation Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Preferences

Diagnosing Multivariate Continuous-Time Models with Application to Affine Term Structure Models

Complex-valued Bayesian parameter estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo

Estimation of risk contributions with MCMC

Estimating the Constant Elasticity of Variance Model with Data-Driven Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods

A Study of the Finite Sample Properties of EMM, GMM, QMLE, and MLE for a Square-Root Interest Rate Diffusion Model

Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Estimating Systemic Risk Allocations

Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Bayesian Model Updating, Model Class Selection, and Model Averaging

Bayesian Estimation of Dynamic Asset Pricing Models with Informative Observations

Maximum Pseudo-Likelihood Estimation of Interest Rate Models for China Interbank Offer Rate

Modelling financial time series based on heavy-tailed market microstructure models with scale mixtures of normal distributions

Improving Simulation Efficiency of MCMC for Inverse Modeling of Hydrologic Systems With a Kalman‐Inspired Proposal Distribution

Efficient Likelihood-based Estimation Via Annealing for Dynamic Structural Macrofinance Models

Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering: An Equivalence Principle and Dimension Reduction

Quasi-Monte Carlo Simulation for American Option Sensitivities

Hamiltonian sequential Monte Carlo with application to consumer choice behavior