Abstract:Abstract. The Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) is a widely used performance measure because of its advantages in orthogonally considering bias, correlation and variability. However, in most Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, error-based formal likelihood functions are commonly applied. Due to its statistically informal characteristics, using the original KGE in MCMC methods leads to problems in posterior density ratios due to negative KGE values and high proposal acceptance rates resulting in less identifiable parameters. In this study we propose adapting the original KGE using a gamma distribution to solve these problems and to apply KGE as an informal likelihood function in the DiffeRential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis DREAM(ZS), which is an advanced MCMC algorithm. We compare our results with the formal likelihood function to show whether our approach is robust and plausible to explore posterior distributions of model parameters and to reproduce the system behaviors. For that we use three case studies that contain different uncertainties and different types of observational data. Our results show that model parameters cannot be identified and the uncertainty of discharge simulations is large when directly using the original KGE. The adapted KGE finds similar posterior distributions of model parameters derived from the formal likelihood function. Even though the acceptance rate of the adapted KGE is lower than the formal likelihood function for some systems, the convergence rate (efficiency) is similar between the formal and the adapted KGE approaches for the calibration of real hydrological systems showing generally acceptable performances. We also show that both the adapted KGE and the formal likelihood function provide low performances for low flows, while the adapted KGE has a balanced performance for both low and high flows. Furthermore, the adapted KGE shows a generally better performance for calibrations of solute concentrations. Thus, our study provides a feasible way to use KGE as an informal likelihood in the MCMC algorithm and provides possibilities to combine multiple data for better and more realistic model calibrations.

Improving Simulation Efficiency of MCMC for Inverse Modeling of Hydrologic Systems With a Kalman‐Inspired Proposal Distribution

Speed-up of posterior inference of highly-parameterized environmental models from a Kalman proposal distribution: DREAM(KZS)

Inverse modeling of hydrologic systems with adaptive multi-fidelity Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations

An Improved Markov Chain Monte Carlo Scheme for Parameter Estimation Analysis

Numerical Approach for Water Distribution System Model Calibration Through Incorporation of Multiple Stochastic Prior Distributions.

The Parameters Optimization in Hydrogeological Model Based on MCMC Method

Achieving Robust and Transferable Performance for Conservation‐Based Models of Dynamical Physical Systems

Efficient History Matching Using the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo Method by Means of the Transformed Adaptive Stochastic Collocation Method

Efficient Bayesian Inverse Modeling of Water Infiltration in Layered Soils

Accelerating Uncertainty Quantification of Groundwater Flow Modelling Using a Deep Neural Network Proxy

Complex-valued Bayesian parameter estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo

Improved MCMC Method and Its Application

Surrogate-Based Inverse Modeling of the Hydrological System: An Adaptive Approach Considering Surrogate Structural Error.

A Vine-Copula Based Adaptive Mcmc Sampler for Efficient Inference of Dynamical Systems

Markov Chain Monte Carlo scheme for parameter uncertainty analysis in water quality model]

Accelerating Bayesian inference in hydrological modeling with a mechanistic emulator

Bayesian Approach for Joint Estimation of Demand and Roughness in Water Distribution Systems

Efficient Evaluation of Small Failure Probability in High-Dimensional Groundwater Contaminant Transport Modeling Via A Two-Stage Monte Carlo Method

Pitfalls and a feasible solution for using KGE as an informal likelihood function in MCMC methods: DREAM (ZS) as an example

Iterative Importance Sampling Algorithms for Parameter Estimation

Tuning of MCMC with Langevin, Hamiltonian, and other stochastic autoregressive proposals