Abstract:Notions of community quality underlie network clustering. While studies surrounding network clustering are increasingly common, a precise understanding of the realtionship between different cluster quality metrics is unknown. In this paper, we examine the relationship between stand-alone cluster quality metrics and information recovery metrics through a rigorous analysis of four widely-used network clustering algorithms -- Louvain, Infomap, label propagation, and smart local moving. We consider the stand-alone quality metrics of modularity, conductance, and coverage, and we consider the information recovery metrics of adjusted Rand score, normalized mutual information, and a variant of normalized mutual information used in previous work. Our study includes both synthetic graphs and empirical data sets of sizes varying from 1,000 to 1,000,000 nodes. We find significant differences among the results of the different cluster quality metrics. For example, clustering algorithms can return a value of 0.4 out of 1 on modularity but score 0 out of 1 on information recovery. We find conductance, though imperfect, to be the stand-alone quality metric that best indicates performance on information recovery metrics. Our study shows that the variant of normalized mutual information used in previous work cannot be assumed to differ only slightly from traditional normalized mutual information. Smart local moving is the best performing algorithm in our study, but discrepancies between cluster evaluation metrics prevent us from declaring it absolutely superior. Louvain performed better than Infomap in nearly all the tests in our study, contradicting the results of previous work in which Infomap was superior to Louvain. We find that although label propagation performs poorly when clusters are less clearly defined, it scales efficiently and accurately to large graphs with well-defined clusters.

Community clustering features in internet topology based on different quality functions

Scalable Community Discovery of Large Networks

Country Neighborhood Network on Territory and Its Geometrical Model.

Detecting Overlapping Community Structures In Networks With Global Partition And Local Expansion

Analysis of Network Clustering Algorithms and Cluster Quality Metrics at Scale

Surveying network community structure in the hidden metric space

Effective community division based on improved spectral clustering.

Enhancing Graph Topology and Clustering Quality: A Modularity-Guided Approach

Finding community structure in spatially constrained complex networks

Detection of Community Structure in Networks Based on Community Coefficients

Sifting out communities in large sparse networks

A Community Detection Algorithm Based on Topology Potential and Spectral Clustering

A Novel Methodologyof Router-To-ASMapping Inspired by Community Discovery.

A New Metric for Quality of Network Community Structure

Analysis of Community Evaluation Criterion and Discovery Algorithm of Weighted Complex Network

Evaluating Community Quality Based on Ground-Truth

A Novel Community Detection Algorithm Based on Paring, Splitting and Aggregating in Internet of Things

Exploiting small world property for network clustering

Uncovering Community Structure In Social Networks By Clique Correlation

Community detection in complex networks using extremal optimization modularity density

Data-driven Clustering in Ad-hoc Networks Based on Community Detection.