Abstract:Calculating wind resistance is an important process in the design of highway bridges. The current codes of many countries include different rules and formulas regarding the calculation of wind resistance. In this paper, the transverse-direction wind loads on long-span girder bridges with tall piers were calculated using six codes from different countries under various terrain, pier height, and girder length conditions. The pier-bottom shear force and moment results of transverse wind loads calculated using these six codes were compared with those obtained using the buffeting frequency domain method. Results showed that, in Class B terrain, wind load results predicated on China's 2004 general codes for the design of highway bridges and culverts, China's 2004 wind-resistant design specifications for highway bridges, Japan's 2007 wind-resistant design manual for highway bridges, and Part 2 of Britain's 2006 steel, concrete, and composite bridge specifications for loads resembled each other closely. Some difference was found to exist among Classes A, C, and D terrain. The 2007 AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications and China's 2001 load codes for the design of building structures showed significant differences from the other four codes on all kinds of terrain. The applicability of the wind load rules in the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications to long-span girder bridges with tall piers merits further discussion. China's wind load calculations of load code for the design of building structures mainly depended on the empirical parameters of architectural structures with large dimensions, and had limited applicability to bridge structures. For long-span girder bridges with tall piers, such as bridges with span length-to-width or -depth ratios exceeding 30, or pier height-to-transverse-width ratio exceeding 10.7, the wind load calculated using these codes was generally underestimated due to the neglect of the effects of aeroelastic forces, which must be taken into account in the design of these kinds of bridges. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000316. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Strait Crossing Cable Stayed Bridge Girder Evolution

Structural design and analysis of a large span partially single-sided cable-stayed pedestrian bridge

Static Instability Analysis Of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges With Carbon Fiber Composite Cable Under Wind Load

Safety Factor for Steel and Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic Cables of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges

Design and Dynamical Analysis of New Light Deployable Bridge

Simulation Analysis of Girder Transport Process on the Box Girder of Hangzhou Bay Bridge

Dynamic Responses of Cable-Stayed Bridges to Vehicular Loading Including the Effects of the Local Vibration of Cables

Aerodynamics and surrounding flow patterns of a long-span bridge girder model with triple-separated boxes

Evolution of suspension bridge structural systems, design theories, and shape-finding methods: A literature survey

Analysis and Comparison on Wind Load of Long Span Girder Bridges with High Pier

Static and Dynamic Behavior of Continuous Box Girder Bridge and Its Experimental Investigation

Dynamic Characteristics of a Double-Pylon Cable-Stayed Bridge with Steel Truss Girder and Single-Cable Plane

Main-girder String Structure with Continuous Cables for Cable-Stayed Bridges

Methods of calculating wind loads on long-span girder bridges with tall piers and comparison of values

Composite Girder Design of Cable-Stayed Bridges

Aerostatic stability of long-span cable-stayed bridges: Parametric study

Experimental Study on Stability of Long-Span PC Cable-Stayed Bridge during the Construction Periods

Structural Performance and Strength Prediction of Steel-To-Concrete Box Girder Deck Transition Zone of Hybrid Steel-Concrete Cable-Stayed Bridges

Inspection and Evaluation of Load-Bearing Capacity of Single Tower Composite Girder Cable -Stayed Bridge

Nonlinear Static Analysis of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges under Dead Loads

Design and behavior of super-long span cable-stayed bridge with CFRP cables and UHPC members