Comprehensive comparison of treating methods for residual liquid of chlorine dioxide generator
Wen-yi DONG,An-na WANG,Gui-nan WU,Fu-xiang ZHAO,Fei-yun SUN,Guan ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2018.02.048
2018-01-01
Abstract:The present paper intends to make a comparative study of the three methods to prepare high concentrated chlorate residue solution in the process of compound chlorine dioxide by taking chlorate as an oxygen-containing anion with strong oxidizing properties. For this need,it is recommended to use the ion exchange membrane,ion exchange resin and the iron powder reduction method. The ion exchange membrane reactor can be operated continuously and continually. When the initial mass concentration of sodium chloride in the exchange solution is 270 g /L,the reaction temperature should be taken as (25 ± 1) ℃,at the initial pH value of 7. 0,with the stirring intensity being 200 r /min and the running time being 240 minutes. In such a condition,the enrichment mass concentration of chlorate can be 13. 06 g /L,that is,6. 5 times of the influent concentration and the removal rate of about 50％,though the ion exchange membrane fail to be repeatedly employed. The results of the dynamic experiment of the ion exchange resin indicate that the enrichment mass concentration rate of chlorate can be expected to reach 23. 51 g /L,that is,11. 8 times of the influent concentration at the removal rate of 95％. In so doing,the following conditions should be satisfied: the residence time: 19. 6 min; the reaction temperature: (25 ± 1) ℃; the initial pH value: 7. 0,and the lasting time: 240 minutes. Otherwise,if the ion exchange resins wanted to be reused and the iron powder were to be used continuously for 15 times, the following conditions have to be satisfied: the initial pH value:2. 0; the iron powder: 10 g; the rotation speed: 150 r /min; the reaction temperature: (25 ± 1) ℃. In such conditions,the removal rate of chlorate can be made as high as to 99％. And,so far as we know,the cost of ion exchange membrane: about 2. 07 yuan /L; the ion exchange resin: 0. 17 yuan /L; and the iron powder reduction method: at about 0. 10 yuan /L,respectively. And, so far as we know,the control condition of the iron powder reduction method can be expected the simplest one because it only needs to be added and mixed in with the equipment. Thus,as compared in treating effect,processing cost and the control condition, the iron powder reduction method can be chosen as the best one.