Linking linear/nonlinear thinking style balance and managerial Ethicaldecision-making: A comparative study between US and Chinese managers

Yongsun Paik,Kevin S. Groves,Charles M. Vance,DongHong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5464.AMBPP.2011.118.a
2011-01-01
Abstract:This paper presents the results of an empirical study comparing American and Chinese managerial thinking styles and ethical decision-making. Contrary to our expectations, Chinese managers demonstrated a significantly greater linear thinking style compared to American managers, while the latter showed a significantly greater nonlinear thinking style. As hypothesized, Chinese and American managers with a balanced thinking style profile demonstrated greater ethical intent across a series of ethics vignettes compared to managers with predominantly linear or nonlinear thinking style profiles. Unexpectedly, Chinese managers were far more likely to adopt a utilitarian rationale for explaining their ethical intent across the vignettes compared to their American counterparts. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical as well as practical implications for the comparative study of American and Chinese managerial thinking style and ethical decision-making.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?