[Value of Zinc Transporter 8 Autoantibody in the Diagnostic Classification of Acute-Onset Diabetics].

Lin YANG,Shuo-ming LUO,Gan HUANG,Jian PENG,Xiang YAN,Janet WENZLAU,Howard W DAVIDSON,John C HUTTON,Zhi-guang ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2010.36.005
2010-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:to explore the application significance of zinc transporter 8 autoantibody (ZnT8A) in the diagnostic classification of acute-onset diabetics. METHODS:according to the status of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) and tyrosine phosphatase antibody (IA2-A), 453 acute-onset diabetics were divided into A+ subgroup (any antibody positive) and A- subgroup (both antibodies negative). A total of 555 type 2 diabetics and 405 healthy controls were recruited. The distribution and correlated factors of ZnT8A were analyzed in the acute-onset diabetic group and two subgroups (A+ and A-). The clinical characteristics were compared between the patients with ZnT8A positive alone and patients without any antibody. All these islet antibodies were measured by radioligand assay. RESULTS:the prevalence of ZnT8A in acute-onset diabetics was 24.3% and it was significantly higher than that in type 2 diabetics (1.8%) and healthy controls (1.0%) (both P < 0.01). The frequency of ZnT8A in A+ subgroup was much higher than A- subgroup (29.7% vs 15.8%, P < 0.01). The positive rates of ZnT8A were much higher in all the subgroups with age at onset of < 30 yr than those with ≥ 30 yr (0 - 9, 34.9%; 10 - 19, 26.7%; 20 - 29, 26.3% vs ≥ 30 yr, 18.3%; all P < 0.05); furthermore, the rates were also higher in BMI < 21.0 kg/m(2) and 21.0 - 25.0 kg/m(2) subgroups than in BMI > 25.0 kg/m(2) subgroup (25.5% and 25.9% vs 8.7%, both P < 0.05). The ZnT8A level was only positively correlated with IA2-A titer (r = 0.165, P = 0.01), but not related to such factors as GADA titer, age at onset, duration, body mass index, HbA1c and CP levels (all P > 0.05). As compared with Ab- patients, the patients with ZnT8A positive alone had much higher insulin injection dosage [(35.5 ± 9.3) U/d vs (29.8 ± 14.7) U/d, P < 0.05], and much lower systolic blood pressures [(107 ± 15) mm Hg vs (113 ± 16) mm Hg, P < 0.05] and diastolic blood pressures [(69 ± 12) mm Hg vs (73 ± 12) mm Hg, P < 0.05]. CONCLUSION:ZnT8A testing may be applied in the diagnostic classification of acute-onset diabetics, especially in those without an evidence of GADA and IA2-A since it helps to identify a clinical phenotype which is more similar to the classic type 1 diabetes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?