Abstract:Study Design. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was translated and then adapted and validated. Objective. Translation of the RMDQ into simplified Chinese characters (SCRMDQ), and its cross-cultural adaptation and validation in patients with low back pain with or without radicular leg pain. Summary of Background Data. The RMDQ is used worldwide and versions in traditional Chinese characters are available in Hong Kong and Taiwan. But there is no version in simplified Chinese characters for use in Mainland China. Methods. The original version of the RMDQ was translated and back-translated, and then cross-cultural adaptation of the simplified Chinese version was performed following published guidelines. The SCRMDQ was validated in 150 patients, 30 of whom finished the prefinal SCRMDQ and helped determine the final version. The remaining 120 patients were asked to complete the final SCRMDQ, simplified Chinese Oswestry Disability Index (SCODI), and visual analogue scale. Reliability was assessed with the final version using internal consistency by the Cronbach alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient; structural validity was evaluated by correspondence analysis. Then comparison of SCRMDQ and SCODI was performed. Results. A total of 116 patients in the final validation study finished the questionnaires completely. Their mean age was 52.17 +/- 11.95 years (range, 22-78 yr) and the mean low back pain duration was 42.04 +/- 60.94 months (range, 2-480 mo). The average time taken was 4.11 +/- 1.48 minutes (range, 2-9 min) on SCRMDQ and 7.37 +/- 3.98 minutes (range, 3-30 min) on SCODI. The mean SCRMDQ, SCODI, and visual analogue scale scores were 14.07 +/- 4.79 (range, 2-24), 23.98 +/- 10.38 (range, 2-47), and 57.17 +/- 20.72 (range, 0-95), respectively. In the final test, the Cronbach a for internal consistency was 0.826 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.947; both showed adequate acceptance. Positive and statistically significant correlations were found between SCRMDQ and SCODI (r = 0.791, P < 0.01) and visual analogue scale (r = 0.493, P < 0.01), indicating sufficient structural validation. Most patients preferred SCRMDQ to SCODI, because it was simpler to understand and easier to finish. Conclusion. The SCRMDQ was reliable and valid as a low back pain measurement tool in patients with or without radicular leg pain in Mainland China. The further use and research with the questionnaire were recommended.

Responsiveness of Chinese Version of Oswestry Disability Index in Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain

Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain

Validity of Chinese Version of Oswestry Disability Index in Assessment for Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Improvement of Oswestry disability index and its test of reliability and validity

Analyzing the Influence of Modic Changes on Patients with Lower Back Pain Undergoing Conservative Treatment.

Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index

Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index

Responsiveness of Nepali version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on individuals with non-specific low back pain

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Validity and Reliability of Simplified Chinese Version of Oswestry Disability Index with Chronic Low Back Pain Induced by Lumbar Chronic Paraspinal Compartment Syndrome

The Chinese Version of Oxford Depression Questionnaire: A Validation Study in Patients with Mood Disorders

Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

Cross-cultural adaptation of Cantonese (Hong Kong) Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1b

Responsiveness of Chinese Version of Neck Outcome Score in Subjects with Neck Pain

The Reliability and Validity of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Community

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Which has Superior Measurement Properties in Older Adults with Low Back Pain?

Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of Roland-Morris disability questionnaire for evaluating urban and rural patients with low back pain

Reliability and Validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Pain Measurement (MOSPM) in Patients with Back Pain

[Application Analysis of Patient Reported Outcome Scale for Low Back and Leg Pain].

Comparison of the Responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Kashin–Beck Disease

West China Hospital Set of Measures in Chinese to Evaluate Back Pain Treatment