Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteHomotopic Perturbed Lambert Algorithm for Long-Duration Rendezvous OptimizationZhen Yang, Ya-Zhong Luo, Jin Zhang and Guo-Jin TangZhen YangCollege of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 410073 Changsha, People’s Republic of China*Ph.D. Candidate, College of Aerospace Science and Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author, Ya-Zhong LuoCollege of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 410073 Changsha, People’s Republic of China†Professor, College of Aerospace Science and Engineering; . Senior Member AIAA (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this author, Jin ZhangCollege of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 410073 Changsha, People’s Republic of China‡Lecturer, College of Aerospace Science and Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author and Guo-Jin TangCollege of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 410073 Changsha, People’s Republic of China§Professor, College of Aerospace Science and Engineering; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:10 Apr 2015https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001198SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Gauss K. F., Theory of Motion of the Heavenly Bodies Moving About the Sun in Conic Sections: A Translation of Gauss’s Theoria Motus, Little, Brown and Co., Boston, 1857, pp. 54–100. Google Scholar[2] Battin R. H., An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics, AIAA Education Series, AIAA, Reston, VA, 1999, pp. 515–566. LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Gooding R. H., “A Procedure for the Solution of Lambert’s Orbital Boundary-Value Problem,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamic Astronomy, Vol. 48, No. 2, 1990, pp. 145–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049511 Google Scholar[4] Loechler L. A., “An Elegant Lambert Algorithm for Multiple Revolution Orbits,” M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1988, http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34998 [retrieved 3 Feb. 2015]. Google Scholar[5] Prussing J. E., “A Class of Optimal Two-Impulse Rendezvous Using Multiple-Revolution Lambert Solutions,” Journal of Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2000, pp. 131–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Shen H. J. and Tsiotras P., “Optimal Two-Impulse Rendezvous Using Multiple-Revolution Lambert Solutions,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2003, pp. 50–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5014 JGCDDT 0162-3192 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Zhang G., Mortari D. and Zhou D., “Constrained Multiple-Revolution Lambert’s Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1779–1786. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.49683 JGCDDT 0162-3192 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Arlulkar P. V. and Naik S. D., “Solution Based on Dynamical Approach for Multiple-Revolution Lambert Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2011, pp. 920–923. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.51723 JGCDDT 0162-3192 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Chen T., Kampen E. V., Yu H. and Chu Q. P., “Optimization of Time-Open Constrained Lambert Rendezvous Using Interval Analysis,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2013, pp. 175–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.56773 JGCDDT 0162-3192 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Engles R. C. and Junkins J. L., “The Gravity-Perturbed Lambert Problem: A K/S Variation of Parameters Approach,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1981, pp. 3–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01228790 CLMCAV 0008-8714 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] Schaub H. and Junkins J. L., Analytical Mechanics of Space Systems, AIAA Education Series, AIAA, Reston, VA, 2003, pp. 443–447. LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Der G. J., “The Superior Lambert Algorithm,” Proceedings of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, Maui Economic Development Board, Maui, HI, 2011, pp. 462–490. Google Scholar[13] Vinti J. P., Orbital and Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 177, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, Reston, VA, 1998, pp. 367–385. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/4.866487 Google Scholar[14] Arkowitz M., Introduction to Homotopy Theory, Springer, New York, 2011, pp. 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7329-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Lee W. J., D’Amario L. A. and Roncoli R. B., “Mission Design Overview for the Mars 2003/2005 Sample Return Mission,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 103, Univelt, San Diego, CA, 1999, pp. 85–102. Google Scholar[16] D’Amario L. A., Bollman W. E., Lee W. J., Roncoli R. B., Smith J. C., Bhat R. S. and Frauenholz R. B., “Mars Orbit Rendezvous Strategy for the Mars 2003/2005 Sample Return Mission,” AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, American Astronautical Soc. Paper 1999-0307, Springfield, VA, Aug. 1999. Google Scholar[17] Ocampo C., Guinn J. and Breeden J., “Rendezvous Options and Dynamics for the Mars Sample Return Mission,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 109, Univelt, San Diego, CA, 2002, pp. 1661–1680. Google Scholar[18] Labourdette P. and Baranov A. A., “Strategies for On-Orbit Rendezvous Circling Mars,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 109, Univelt, San Diego, CA, 2002, pp. 1351–1368. Google Scholar[19] Labourdette P. and Baranov A. A., “A Software for Rendezvous Between Near-Circular Orbits with Large Initial Ascending Node Difference,” Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, Keldysh Inst. of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences Paper ISSFD-2003-1105, Moscow, June 2003. Google Scholar[20] Yang Z., Luo Y. Z. and Zhang J., “Two-Level Optimization Approach for Mars Orbital Long-Duration, Large Non-Coplanar Rendezvous Phasing Maneuvers,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 52, No. 5, Sept. 2013, pp. 883–894. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.05.013 ASRSDW 0273-1177 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Vallado D. A., Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, 2nd ed., Microscosm Press, El Segundo, CA, 2001, pp. 644–652. Google Scholar[22] Sidi A., Practical Extrapolation Methods: Theory and Applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, U.K., 2003, pp. 21–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Hughes S. P., Mailhe L. M. and Guzman J. J., “A Comparison of Trajectory Optimization Methods for the Impulsive Minimum Fuel Rendezvous Problem,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 113, Univelt, San Diego, CA, 2003, pp. 85–104. Google Scholar[24] Luo Y. Z., Tang G. J., Lei Y. J. and Li H. Y., “Optimization of Multiple-Impulse, Multiple-Revolution, Rendezvous-Phasing Maneuvers,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2007, pp. 946–952. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.25620 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Luo Y. Z. and Tang G. J., “Parallel Simulated Annealing Using Simplex Method,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 44, No. 12, 2004, pp. 3143–3146. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.16778 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NotesAlgorithm of Relative Lambert Transfer Based on Relative Orbital ElementsHuan Chen, Chao Han, Yinrui Rao, Jianfeng Yin and Xiucong SunHuan ChenBeihang University, 100191 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Chao HanBeihang University, 100191 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Yinrui RaoChina Academy of Engineering Physics, 621999 Mianyang, People's Republic of China, Jianfeng YinChina Academy of Space Technology, 100094 Beijing, People's Republic of China and Xiucong SunBeihang University, 100191 Beijing, People's Republic of ChinaPublished Online:11 Jan 2019https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003348SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] D'Amico S., Ardaens J.-S. and Larsson R., "Spaceborne Autonomous Formation-Ying Experiment on the PRISMA Mission," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2012, pp. 834–850. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.55638JGCODS0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Gaias G. and Ardaens J.-S., "Flight Demonstration of Autonomous Noncooperative Rendezvous in Low Earth Orbit," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2018, pp. 1337–1354. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003239JGCODS0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Koenig A. W., Guffanti T. and D'Amico S., "New State Transition Matrices for Spacecraft Relative Motion in Perturbed Orbits," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 7, 2017, pp. 1749–1768. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002409JGCODS0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Battin R. H., Astronautical Guidance, McGraw–Hill, New York, 1964, Chap. 3. Google Scholar[5] Jiang F., Li J., Baoyin H. and Gao Y., "Two-Point Boundary Value Problem Solutions to Spacecraft Formation Flying," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1827–1837. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.43064 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Jonghee B., Gwanghyeok J. and Youdan K., "Spacecraft Formation Reconfiguration in Elliptic Reference Orbit," AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2013-5241, 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-5241 Google Scholar[7] Prussing J. E., "A Class of Optimal Two-Impulse Rendezvous Using Multiple-Revolution Lambert Solutions," Journal of the Astronautical Science, Vol. 48, Nos. 2–3, 2000, pp. 131–148. Google Scholar[8] He Q., Li J. and Han C., "Multiple-Revolution Solutions of the Transverse-Eccentricity-Based Lambert's Problem," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2010, pp. 265–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.45041 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Mullins L. D., "Initial Value and Two Point Boundary Value Solutions to the Clohessy–Wiltshire Equations," Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1992, pp. 487–501. Google Scholar[10] Yamanaka K. and Ankersen F., "New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2002, pp. 60–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4875JGCODS0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Zhang G., Zhou D. and Mortari D., "An Approximate Analytical Method for Short-Range Impulsive Orbit Rendezvous Using Relative Lambert Solutions," Acta Astronautica, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2012, pp. 318–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.05.037 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Alfriend K. T., Vadali S. R., Gurfil P., How J. P. and Breger L. S., Spacecraft Formation Flying Dynamics, Control and Navigation, Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 2010, Chap. 1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] D'Amico S. and Montenbruck O., "Proximity Operations of Formation Flying Spacecraft Using an Eccentricity/Inclination Vector Separation," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2006, pp. 554–563. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.15114 LinkGoogle Scholar[14] Han C. and Yin J. F., "Formation Design in Elliptical Orbit Using Relative Orbital Elements," Acta Aeronautica, Vol. 77, Aug.–Sept. 2012, pp. 34–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.026 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Wen C., Zhao Y., Li B. and Shi P., "Solving the Relative Lambert's Problem and Accounting for Its Singularities," Acta Aeronautica, Vol. 97, April–May 2014, pp. 122–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.12.016 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Chen H., Rao Y., Han C. and Li J., "Relative Lambert Transfer Based on Relative Orbital Elements and the Application in Hovering Formation Control," 26th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, AAS Paper 16-261, San Diego, CA, 2016. Google Scholar[17] Rao Y., Yin J. and Han C., "Hovering Formation Design and Control Based on Relative Orbital Elements," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2016, pp. 360–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001238 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Gaias G. and D'Amico S., "Impulsive Maneuvers for Formation Reconfiguration Using Relative Orbital Elements," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2015, pp. 1036–1049. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000189JGCODS0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Chernick M. and D'Amico S., "New Closed-Form Solutions for Optimal Impulsive Control of Spacecraft Relative Motion," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2018, pp. 301–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002848JGCODS0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byHigher-Order Lambert Problem Solution Based on Differential AlgebraPeng Shu , Zhen Yang and Ya-Zhong Luo1 July 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 10Numerical Solution for the Single-Impulse Flyby Co-Orbital Spacecraft Problem11 July 2022 | Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 7Relative Transfer Singularities and Multi-Revolution Lambert UniquenessJackson Kulik and Dmitry Savransky29 December 2021An evolutionary discretized Lambert approach for optimal long-range rendezvous considering impulse limitAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 94 What's Popular Volume 42, Number 6June 2019 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2018 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsAstronomyCelestial MechanicsKepler's Laws of Planetary MotionOrbital ManeuversOrbital PropertyPlanetary Science and ExplorationPlanetsSpace OrbitSpace Science and Technology KeywordsOrbital ElementsAstronauticsSatellite FormationArgument of LatitudeElliptical OrbitEarthKeplerian OrbitOrbital PeriodWorld Geodetic SystemClohessy Wiltshire EquationAcknowledgmentsThis research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 61703380) and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (no. 4184092). The authors appreciate constructive comments from Associate Editor Simone D'Amico and the anonymous reviewers.PDF Received23 September 2017Accepted26 November 2018Published online11 January 2019

Constrained Multiple-Revolution Lambert'S Problem

Multiple-Revolution Solutions of the Transverse-Eccentricity-Based Lambert Problem

USING BATTIN'S METHOD TO OBTAIN MULTIPLE-REVOLUTION LAMBERT'S SOLUTIONS

Homotopic Perturbed Lambert Algorithm For Long-Duration Rendezvous Optimization

Lambert's problem and solution by non-rational Bezier functions

Lambert-Free Solution of Multiple-Gravity-Assist Optimization Problem

Optimal Two-Impulse Rendezvous Using Multiple-Revolution Lambert Solutions

Two-Impulse Cotangent Rendezvous Between Coplanar Elliptic and Hyperbolic Orbits

Lambert Solution and Application for Interplanetary Low-thrust Trajectories

Feedback-Accelerated Picard Iteration for Orbit Propagation and Lambert’s Problem

Algorithm of Relative Lambert Transfer Based on Relative Orbital Elements

Solution algorithm of a quasi-Lambert’s problem with fixed flight-direction angle constraint

Optimization of Multiple-Impulse, Multiple-Revolution, Rendezvous- Phasing Maneuvers

Solving the Relative Lambert's Problem and Accounting for Its Singularities

Solution of the Probabilistic Lambert's Problem: Optimal Transport Approach

Improved Semi-Major Axis Iterated Method for Lambert'S Problem

Application of the Theory of Functional Connections to the Perturbed Lambert's Problem

Higher-Order Lambert Problem Solution Based on Differential Algebra

Improvement Algorithm of Initial Iterative Value Selecting for Lambert Problem

Optimal Two-Impulse Cotangent Rendezvous Between Coplanar Elliptical Orbits

Solving and analyzing relative Lambert's problem through differential orbital elements