Abstract:No AccessEngineering NotesMinimum-Time Low-Thrust Geocentric Transfer with Longitude Estimation and Costate PredictionZhao Li, Di Wu, Hengnian Li and Fanghua JiangZhao Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5118-540XTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Di Wu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5214-962XTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Hengnian LiXi’an Satellite Control Center, 710043 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China and Fanghua JiangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaPublished Online:18 Sep 2023https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G007333SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Poole M. and Ho M., “Boeing Low-Thrust Geosynchronous Transfer Mission Experience,” Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Annapolis, MD, Sept. 2007, Paper 23-1. Google Scholar[2] Boniface C., Charbonnier J.-M., Lefebvre L., Leroi V. and Lienart T., “An Overview of Electric Propulsion Activities at CNES,” 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, GA, Oct. 2017, Paper IEPC-2017-102. Google Scholar[3] Sreesawet S. and Dutta A., “Fast and Robust Computation of Low-Thrust Orbit-Raising Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2018, pp. 1888–1905. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003319 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Graham K. F. and Rao A. V., “Minimum-Time Trajectory Optimization of Multiple Revolution Low-Thrust Earth-Orbit Transfers,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2015, pp. 711–727. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33187 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Pan B., Pan X. and Lu P., “Finding Best Solution in Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Two-Phase Homotopy,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2019, pp. 283–291. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34144 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Scheel W. A. and Conway B. A., “Optimization of Very-Low-Thrust, Many-Revolution Spacecraft Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1994, pp. 1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21331 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Caruso A., Quarta A. A. and Mengali G., “Comparison Between Direct and Indirect Approach to Solar Sail Circle-to-Circle Orbit Raising Optimization,” Astrodynamics, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2019, pp. 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-019-0040-x CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Leomanni M., Bianchini G., Garulli A., Quartullo R. and Scortecci F., “Optimal Low-Thrust Orbit Transfers Made Easy: A Direct Approach,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 58, No. 6, 2021, pp. 1904–1914. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34949 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Graham K. F. and Rao A. V., “Minimum-Time Trajectory Optimization of Low-Thrust Earth-Orbit Transfers with Eclipsing,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2016, pp. 289–303. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33416 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Shannon J. L., Ozimek M. T., Atchison J. A. and Hartzell C. M., “Q-Law Aided Direct Trajectory Optimization of Many-Revolution Low-Thrust Transfers,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2020, pp. 672–682. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34586 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Ghosh P., “A Survey of the Methods Available for the Design of Many-Revolution Low-Thrust Planetocentric Trajectories,” 29th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, AAS Paper 19-297, Jan. 2019. Google Scholar[12] Zuiani F. and Vasile M., “Extended Analytical Formulas for the Perturbed Keplerian Motion under a Constant Control Acceleration,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 121, No. 3, 2015, pp. 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-014-9600-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Petropoulos A., “Low-Thrust Orbit Transfers Using Candidate Lyapunov Functions with a Mechanism for Coasting,” AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-Located Conferences, AIAA Paper 2004-5089, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-5089 Google Scholar[14] Petropoulos A. E., “Refinements to the Q-law for the Low-Thrust Orbit Transfers,” AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Conference, AAS Paper 05-162, Jan. 2005. Google Scholar[15] Prussing J. E., “Primer Vector Theory and Applications,” Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization, edited by Conway B. A., Cambridge Aerospace Series, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, U.K., 2010, pp. 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778025.003 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Quarta A. A., Izzo D. and Vasile M., “Time-Optimal Trajectories to Circumsolar Space Using Solar Electric Propulsion,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2013, pp. 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.09.012 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Taheri E., Arya V. and Junkins J. L., “Costate Mapping for Indirect Trajectory Optimization,” Astrodynamics, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2021, pp. 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-021-0114-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[18] Pontani M., “Optimal Space Trajectories with Multiple Coast Arcs Using Modified Equinoctial Elements,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 191, No. 2, 2021, pp. 545–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-021-01867-2 Google Scholar[19] Wu D., Wang W., Jiang F. and Li J., “Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Many-Revolution Geocentric Trajectories with Analytical Costates Initialization,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 119, Dec. 2021, Paper 107146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107146 Google Scholar[20] Caillau J., Gergaud J. and Noailles J., “3D Geosynchronous Transfer of a Satellite: Continuation on the Thrust,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 118, No. 3, 2003, pp. 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000004870.74778.ae CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Jiang F., Baoyin H. and Li J., “Practical Techniques for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization with Homotopic Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, pp. 245–258. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.52476 LinkGoogle Scholar[22] Haberkorn T., Martinon P. and Gergaud J., “Low Thrust Minimum-Fuel Orbital Transfer: A Homotopic Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1046–1060. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4022 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Pan B., Lu P., Pan X. and Ma Y., “Double-Homotopy Method for Solving Optimal Control Problems,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2016, pp. 1706–1720. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001553 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Kluever C. A. and Oleson S. R., “Direct Approach for Computing Near-Optimal Low-Thrust Earth-Orbit Transfers,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1998, pp. 509–515. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3360 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Gao Y., “Near-Optimal Very Low-Thrust Earth-Orbit Transfers and Guidance Schemes,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2007, pp. 529–539. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.24836 LinkGoogle Scholar[26] Gao Y., “Direct Optimization of Low-Thrust Many-Revolution Earth-Orbit Transfers,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2009, pp. 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60121-1 Google Scholar[27] Kluever C. A., “Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization Using Orbital Averaging and Control Parameterization,” Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization, edited by Conway B., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, U.K., 2010, pp. 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778025.006 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[28] Falck R. and Dankanich J., “Optimization of Low-Thrust Spiral Trajectories by Collocation,” AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AIAA Paper 2012-4423, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-4423 Google Scholar[29] Sackett L. L., Malchow H. L. and Edelbaum T. N., “Solar Electric Geocentric Transfer with Attitude Constraints: Analysis,” NASA CR-134927, Aug. 1975. LinkGoogle Scholar[30] Geffroy S. and Epenoy R., “Optimal Low-Thrust Transfers with Constraints—Generalization of Averaging Techniques,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1997, pp. 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(97)00208-7 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[31] Dargent T., “Averaging Technique in T-3D an Integrated Tool for Continuous Thrust Optimal Control in Orbit Transfers,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 152, 2014, pp. 1599–1615. Google Scholar[32] Kelchner M. J. and Kluever C. A., “Rapid Evaluation of Low-Thrust Transfers from Elliptical Orbits to Geostationary Orbit,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 57, No. 5, 2020, pp. 898–906. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34630 LinkGoogle Scholar[33] Li Z., Li H., Zhou H. and Jiang F., “Learning-Based Polynomial Approximation of Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Transfers to Geostationary Orbit,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 59, No. 3, 2023, pp. 2388–2401. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2022.3213533 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[34] Walker M. J. H., Ireland B. and Owens J., “A Set of Modified Equinoctial Orbit Elements,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1985, pp. 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01227493 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[35] Izzo D. and Öztürk E., “Real-Time Guidance for Low-Thrust Transfers Using Deep Neural Networks,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2021, pp. 315–327. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005254 LinkGoogle Scholar[36] Hubaux C., Lemaître A., Delsate N. and Carletti T., “Symplectic Integration of Space Debris Motion Considering Several Earth’s Shadowing Models,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 49, No. 10, 2012, pp. 1472–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.02.009 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[37] Topputo F. and Ceccherini S., “A Catalogue of Parametric Time-Optimal Transfers for All-Electric GEO Satellites,” Modeling and Optimization in Space Engineering: State of the Art and New Challenges, edited by Fasano G. and Pintér J. D., Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2019, pp. 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10501-3_17 Google Scholar[38] Caillau J.-B. and Noailles J., “Sensitivity Analysis for Time Optimal Orbit Transfer,” Optimization, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2001, pp. 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331930108844536 Google Scholar[39] Ferrier CH. and Epenoy R., “Optimal Control for Engines with Electro-Ionic Propulsion Under Constraint of Eclipse,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2001, pp. 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(00)00158-2 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[40] Standish E. M., “Keplerian Elements for Approximate Positions of the Major Planets,” JPL Solar System Dynamics, 2006, https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/. Google Scholar[41] Shampine L. F. and Gordon M. K., Computer Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations: The Initial Value Problem, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1975, Chap. 10. Google Scholar[42] Moré J. J., Garbow B. S. and Hillstrom K. E., “User Guide for MINPACK-1,” Argonne National Lab. ANL-80-74, Argonne, IL, Aug. 1980. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails What's Popular Articles in Advance CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2023 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamicsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsAstronomical EventsAstronomyControl TheoryElectric PropulsionFluid DynamicsGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsOptimal Control TheoryPropulsion and PowerSpace OrbitSpace Science and TechnologySpacecraft Propulsion KeywordsElectric PropulsionTrajectory OptimizationPerturbed OrbitEclipsesLow Thrust TrajectoryEarthPontryagin's Maximum PrincipleThrustOrbital ElementsOrbital TransferAcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12022214) and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFC2201200).PDF Received29 October 2022Accepted9 August 2023Published online18 September 2023

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteImproving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based PathFanghua Jiang, Gao Tang and Junfeng LiFanghua JiangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Associate Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; . Senior Member AIAA (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this author, Gao TangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Master’s Student, School of Aerospace Engineering; currently Ph.D. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Duke University; .Search for more papers by this author and Junfeng LiTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Aug 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002803SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Hellín X. L., “Study of Earth-to-Mars Transfers with Low-Thrust Propulsion,” Polytechnic Univ. of Catalonia, School of Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, Project Rept., Terrassa, Spain, Sept. 2011. Google Scholar[2] Betts J. T., “Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, pp. 193–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4231 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Casalino L., “Approximate Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers Between Low-Eccentricity Close Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2014, pp. 1003–1008. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.62046 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Gatto G. and Casalino L., “Fast Evaluation and Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers to Multiple Targets,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2015, pp. 1525–1530. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001116 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Zhao S. G., Gurfil P. and Zhang J. R., “Initial Costates for Low-Thrust Minimum-Time Station Change of Geostationary Satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2746–2756. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000431 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Dixon L. C. W. and Biggs M. C., “The Advantages of Adjoint-Control Transformations When Determining Optimal Trajectories by Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 76, No. 735, 1972, pp. 169–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000042731 Google Scholar[7] Russell R. P., “Primer Vector Theory Applied to Global Low-Thrust Trade Studies,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2007, pp. 460–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.22984 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Guo T. D., Jiang F. H. and Li J. F., “Homotopic Approach and Pseudospectral Method Applied Jointly to Low Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 71, Feb.–March 2012, pp. 38–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.08.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Petropoulos A. E. and Longuski J. M., “Shape-Based Algorithm for the Automated Design of Low-Thrust, Gravity-Assist Trajectories,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2004, pp. 787–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.13095 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Wall B. J. and Conway B. A., “Shape-Based Approach to Low-Thrust Rendezvous Trajectory Design,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2009, pp. 95–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36848 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Gondelach D. J. and Noomen R., “Hodographic-Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Interplanetary Trajectory Design,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2015, pp. 728–738. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32991 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Taheri E. and Abdelkhalik O., “Initial Three-Dimensional Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2016, pp. 889–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.11.034 Google Scholar[13] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-State Initialization for the Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 59, No. 9, 2017, pp. 2360–2373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.010 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-States Initialization of Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectories Using Shape-Based Methods,” American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, July 2016, pp. 4053–4058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525558 Google Scholar[15] Jiang F. H., Baoyin H. X. and Li J. F., “Practical Techniques for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization with Homotopic Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, pp. 245–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.52476 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Tang G. and Jiang F. H., “Capture of Near-Earth Objects with Low-Thrust Propulsion and Invariant Manifolds,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 1, 2016, Paper 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2592-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Lewallen J. M., Schwausch O. A. and Tapley B. D., “Coordinate System Influence on the Regularized Trajectory Optimization Problem,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1971, pp. 15–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.30211 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Ranieri C. L. and Ocampo C. A., “Indirect Optimization of Spiral Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1360–1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19539 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Jiang F. H. and Tang G., “Systematic Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization for a Multi-Rendezvous Mission Using Adjoint Scaling,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 4, 2016, Paper 117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2704-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Bertrand R. and Epenoy R., “New Smoothing Techniques for Solving Bang–Bang Optimal Control Problems Numerical Results and Statistical Interpretation,” Optimal Control Applications and Methods, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2002, pp. 171–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.709 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] More J. J., Garbow B. S. and Hillstrom K. E., “User Guide for MinPack-1,” Argonne National Lab. Rept. ANL-80-74, Lemont, IL, 1980; also https://github.com/devernay/cminpack [retrieved 10 Dec. 2012]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Novak D. M. and Vasile M., “Improved Shaping Approach to the Preliminary Design of Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2011, pp. 128–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50434 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Xie C., Zhang G. and Zhang Y., “Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories with Large Out-of-Plane Motion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2780–2789. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001795 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Popescu M., “Applications of Canonical Transformations in Optimizing Orbital Transfers,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1997, pp. 774–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4112 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Wall B. J. and Novak D. M., “A 3D Shape-Based Approximation Method for Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 142, Jan. 2012, pp. 1163–1176; also American Astronomical Soc. Paper 11-479, 2011. Google Scholar[26] Kluever C. A., “Efficient Computation of Optimal Interplanetary Trajectories Using Solar Electric Propulsion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2014, pp. 821–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000144 LinkGoogle Scholar[27] Taheri E., Kolmanovsky I. and Atkins E., “Enhanced Smoothing Technique for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2016, pp. 2500–2511. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000379 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byExploiting Scaling Constants to Facilitate the Convergence of Indirect Trajectory Optimization Methods12 February 2023 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 8GTOC 11: Results from Tsinghua University and Shanghai Institute of Satellite EngineeringActa Astronautica, Vol. 202Atlas of Optimal Low-Thrust Rephasing Solutions in Circular OrbitDi Wu, Xiang Guo , Fanghua Jiang and Hexi Baoyin23 December 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 0, No. 0Rapid optimization of continuous trajectory for multi-target exploration propelled by electric sailsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129Analytical Costate Estimation by a Reference Trajectory-Based Least-Squares MethodDi Wu, Lin Cheng , Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Fast costate estimation for indirect trajectory optimization using Bezier-curve-based shaping approachAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 126Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Optimal Planar Orbit TransfersEnrico Schiassi, Andrea D’Ambrosio , Kristofer Drozd , Fabio Curti and Roberto Furfaro 4 January 2022 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 59, No. 3Efficient optimization method for variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories with shutdown constraint7 February 2022 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 65, No. 3Analytical shaping method for low-thrust rendezvous trajectory using cubic spline functionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 72High-precision shape approximation low-thrust trajectory optimization method satisfying bi-objective indexChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 1Analytic Costate Initialization from Rough State-Trajectory EstimatesEmmanuel E. Skamangas, John A. Lawton and Jonathan T. Black6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 12Minimum-time low-thrust many-revolution geocentric trajectories with analytical costates initializationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 119A New 3D Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Trajectories between Non-Intersect Orbits24 October 2021 | Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 11Fuel-Optimal Spacecraft Cluster Flight Around an Ellipsoidal AsteroidWei Wang, Di Wu, Hanlun Lei and Hexi Baoyin7 July 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Rapid generation of low-thrust many-revolution earth-center trajectories based on analytical state-based controlActa Astronautica, Vol. 187Warm Start for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Switched SystemDi Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li21 June 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 9A homotopy approach connecting time-optimal with fuel-optimal trajectories19 January 2021 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 366, No. 1Warm-Start Multihomotopic Optimization for Low-Thrust Many-Revolution TrajectoriesIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 56, No. 6Efficient Computation of Optimal Low Thrust Gravity Perturbed Orbit Transfers14 May 2019 | The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 67, No. 2Optimization of Variable-Specific-Impulse Gravity-Assist TrajectoriesZhemin Chi, Di Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li14 November 2019 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 57, No. 2Multi-revolution low-thrust trajectory optimization using symplectic methods31 December 2019 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 63, No. 3Deep networks as approximators of optimal low-thrust and multi-impulse cost in multitarget missionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 166A data-driven indirect method for nonlinear optimal control28 August 2019 | Astrodynamics, Vol. 3, No. 4Real-Time Optimal Control for Spacecraft Orbit Transfer via Multiscale Deep Neural NetworksIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 55, No. 5Solar sail trajectory optimization of multi-asteroid rendezvous missionActa Astronautica, Vol. 157Fast Homotopy Method for Asteroid Landing Trajectory Optimization Using Approximate Initial CostatesHongwei Yang, Shuang Li and Xiaoli Bai26 November 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Low-Thrust Minimum-Fuel Trajectory Optimization Using Multiple Shooting Augmented by Analytical DerivativesYazhe Meng, Hao Zhang and Yang Gao20 December 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Neural Networks in Time-Optimal Low-Thrust Interplanetary TransfersIEEE Access, Vol. 7Initial Three-Dimensional Trajectory Design for Solar Sails Using Bezier Shaping ApproachIEEE Access, Vol. 7Learning Trajectories for Real- Time Optimal Control of QuadrotorsPhase-matching homotopic method for indirect optimization of long-duration low-thrust trajectoriesAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 62, No. 3Multi-rendezvous low-thrust trajectory optimization using costate transforming and homotopic approach23 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Power-limited low-thrust trajectory optimization with operation point detection18 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Performance Comparison of Smoothing Functions for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-thrust TrajectoriesEhsan Taheri, Ella M. Atkins and Ilya Kolmanovsky7 January 2018On Satellite Orbit Decay Compensation in Low Earth OrbitsEhsan Taheri, Robert A. Zidek, Ilya Kolmanovsky and Anouck Girard7 January 2018Homotopy method for optimization of variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories30 October 2017 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 362, No. 11 What's Popular Volume 40, Number 12December 2017 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2017 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsBoundary Element MethodComputational Fluid DynamicsFinite Difference MethodFluid DynamicsNumerical AnalysisOrbital ManeuversPseudospectral MethodsRunge-Kutta MethodsSpace Orbit KeywordsThrustTrajectory OptimizationNumerical OptimizationEarthIon ThrusterCylindrical Coordinate SystemOrbital TransferNumerical IntegrationParticle Swarm OptimizationLegendre Pseudospectral MethodAcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 11672146 and 11432001).PDF Received31 January 2017Accepted6 June 2017Published online2 August 2017

Two-Impulse Cotangent Rendezvous Between Coplanar Elliptic and Hyperbolic Orbits

Homotopic Perturbed Lambert Algorithm For Long-Duration Rendezvous Optimization

Optimal Two-Impulse Cotangent Rendezvous Between Coplanar Elliptical Orbits

Simple Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories Between Coplanar Elliptical Orbits

Algorithm of Relative Lambert Transfer Based on Relative Orbital Elements

Approximation of Optimal Impulsive Flyby Transfer with Terminal Inspection Constraints

Optimization of Low-Thrust Rendezvous Between Circular Orbits Via Thrust-Switch Strategy

Analytical State Propagation for Continuous-Thrust Linear Relative Motion

Analytical State Approximation of Electric Sail with Fixed Pitch Angle

Tangent Orbit Technique in Three Dimensions

Analysis of Two-Impulse Capture Trajectories into Halo Orbits of Sun–Mars System

Orbital Element Reachable Set after Gravity Assists of Planets in Elliptical Orbits

Minimum-Time Rendezvous via Simplified Initial Costate Normalization and Auxiliary Orbital Transfer

Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Geocentric Transfer with Longitude Estimation and Costate Prediction

Low-Thrust Transfer Between Circular Orbits Using Natural Precession and Yaw Switch Steering

Optimal Two-Impulse Rendezvous with Terminal Tangent Burn Considering the Trajectory Constraints

Uncertainty Quantification for Short Rendezvous Missions Using a Nonlinear Covariance Propagation Method

Optimal Multiple-impulse Rendezvous Between Non-coplanar Elliptic Orbits Considering the J2 Perturbation Effects

New Solution for Rendezvous Between Geosynchronous Satellites Using Low Thrust

Minimum-Fuel Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Reachability Analysis and Convex Programming

Improving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based Path