Abstract:Background: The non-invasive estimation of aortic systolic (aoSBP) and pulse pressure (aoPP) is achieved by a great variety of devices, which differ markedly in the: 1) principles of recording (applied technology), 2) arterial recording site, 3) model and mathematical analysis applied to signals, and/or 4) calibration scheme. The most reliable non-invasive procedure to obtain aoSBP and aoPP is not well established. Aim: To evaluate the agreement between aoSBP and aoPP values invasively and non-invasively obtained using different: 1) recording techniques (tonometry, oscilometry/plethysmography, ultrasound), 2) recording sites [radial, brachial (BA) and carotid artery (CCA)], 3) waveform analysis algorithms (e.g., direct analysis of the CCA pulse waveform vs. peripheral waveform analysis using general transfer functions, N-point moving average filters, etc.), 4) calibration schemes (systolic-diastolic calibration vs. methods using BA diastolic and mean blood pressure (bMBP); the latter calculated using different equations vs. measured directly by oscillometry, and 5) different equations to estimate bMBP (i.e., using a form factor of 33% ("033"), 41.2% ("0412") or 33% corrected for heart rate ("033HR"). Methods: The invasive aortic (aoBP) and brachial pressure (bBP) (catheterization), and the non-invasive aoBP and bBP were simultaneously obtained in 34 subjects. Non-invasive aoBP levels were obtained using different techniques, analysis methods, recording sites, and calibration schemes. Results: 1) Overall, non-invasive approaches yielded lower aoSBP and aoPP levels than those recorded invasively. 2) aoSBP and aoPP determinations based on CCA recordings, followed by BA recordings, were those that yielded values closest to those recorded invasively. 3) The "033HR" and "0412" calibration schemes ensured the lowest mean error, and the "033" method determined aoBP levels furthest from those recorded invasively. 4) Most of the non-invasive approaches considered overestimated and underestimated aoSBP at low (i.e., 80 mmHg) and high (i.e., 180 mmHg) invasive aoSBP values, respectively. 5) The higher the invasively measured aoPP, the higher the level of underestimation provided by the non-invasive methods. Conclusion: The recording method and site, the mathematical method/model used to quantify aoSBP and aoPP, and to calibrate waveforms, are essential when estimating aoBP. Our study strongly emphasizes the need for methodological transparency and consensus for the non-invasive aoBP assessment.

Invasive and Non-Invasive Measurement in Medicine and Biology: Calibration Issues

Improving calibration accuracy of a vibration sensor through a closed loop measurement system.

Physical Sensors And Measurement

Technologies for non-invasive physiological sensing: Status, challenges, and future horizons

Applied strategy for options of invasive and non-invasive sensors and instruments

Research on the Best Measurement Situation Between Optical Probe and Tissue Surfaces in Non-Invasive Detection.

In Situ Drift Monitoring and Calibration of Field-Deployed Potentiometric Sensors Using Temperature Supervision

Aortic systolic and pulse pressure invasively and non-invasively obtained: Comparative analysis of recording techniques, arterial sites of measurement, waveform analysis algorithms and calibration methods

Calibration algorithms for continuous glucose monitoring systems based on interstitial fluid sensing

Dynamic Calibration of Nonlinear Sensors with Time-Drifts and Delays by Bayesian Inference

Challenges and Opportunities in Calibrating Low-Cost Environmental Sensors

[Technology and Prospects of Noninvasive Blood Glucose Measurement].

The MATCHY Study

Integrated circuits and electrode interfaces for noninvasive physiological monitoring

Real-Time Tunable Dynamic Range for Calibration-Free Biomolecular Measurements with a Temperature-Modulated Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Sensor in an Unprocessed Actual Sample

Calibrating chemical multisensory devices for real world applications: An in-depth comparison of quantitative Machine Learning approaches

Non-invasive continuous blood pressure sensors in biomedical engineering research: A review

National Institute of Standards and Technology measurement service of the optical properties of biomedical phantoms: Current status

Everything You Wanted to Know About Noninvasive Glucose Measurement and Control

Pain-Free Blood Glucose Monitoring Using Wearable Sensors: Recent Advancements and Future Prospects

Current state of the art and future directions for implantable sensors in medical technology: Clinical needs and engineering challenges