Abstract:Security protocols are distributed programs designed to ensure secure communication in a network controlled by an adversary. They are widely used today for securing on-line services such as personal communication and electronic voting. Their design is notoriously error-prone, and a great deal of research has been devoted to their analysis. In this thesis we provide two main contributions towards the automated analysis of such protocols: algorithms for the symbolic analysis of equivalence properties, and a symbolic probabilistic framework for security protocol analysis. We consider the problem of verifying two equivalence properties relevant in protocol analysis: static equivalence and trace equivalence. Both notions model the property that an attacker cannot distinguish between two protocol executions, and they have been used to model security goals such as off-line guessing, electronic voting anonymity, and RFID untraceability. Static equivalence is concerned with an attacker who passively eavesdrop on a network and then tries to distinguish between possible executions by performing off-line computations. Trace equivalence is used in the analysis of security properties against an attacker who may participate actively in protocol execution. We present an efficient decision procedure for static equivalence under equational theories generated by subterm convergent rewriting systems. This class of theories encompasses the most common cryptographic primitives, including symmetric and asymmetric encryption and decryption, hash functions and digital signatures. Our algorithm achieves a better asymptotic complexity than competing algorithms, albeit with a narrower scope. We discuss its implementation in the FAST tool and show that it indeed performs much more efficiently than other existing tools for the same task. We also present a procedure for deciding the trace equivalence of bounded simple processes under equational theories generated by convergent rewriting systems and for which a finitary unification algorithm exists. Although we do not have a termination result, our procedure is correct for the largest class of equational theories handled by any existing procedure for deciding trace equivalence and, together with the work by Cheval et. al [64], it is the only one to handle non-trivial else branches. Finally, we introduce a symbolic probabilistic framework for the analysis of security protocols. Our framework provides a general method for expressing weak-

A Logic for Signature Based Security Protocols

A Verification Logic for Security Protocols Based on Computational Semantics

New Logic for Analyzing Security Protocols

A logic of authentication

A Logic of Belief and a Model Checking Algorithm for Security Protocols.

Analysis of Security Protocols Based on Challenge-Response

A Formally Verified Scheme for Security Protocols with the Operational Semantics of Strand Space

Select Accept Dynamic Logic

Security Theorems via Model Theory

Security Protocol's Extended Horn Logic Model and Its Verification Method

A new method for analyzing and improving security protocols

Modal Logic Approach for Analyzing Security Protocol Guessing Attacks

Expression Object-Oriented of Universal Logic

On Signatures and Authentication

Formal Model for Security Protocols Based on State Transition System

A Formal Specification and Verification Framework for Timed Security Protocols.

Verifying Security Protocols Using Dynamic Strategies

Formal Description and Analysis of Security Protocols

Equivalence Properties and Probabilistic Reasoning in Symbolic Security Protocol Analysis

Formal Verification Techniques for Security Protocols

Formal Analysis for Security of Otway-Rees Protocol with BAN Logic