Abstract:Security protocols are distributed programs designed to ensure secure communication in a network controlled by an adversary. They are widely used today for securing on-line services such as personal communication and electronic voting. Their design is notoriously error-prone, and a great deal of research has been devoted to their analysis. In this thesis we provide two main contributions towards the automated analysis of such protocols: algorithms for the symbolic analysis of equivalence properties, and a symbolic probabilistic framework for security protocol analysis. We consider the problem of verifying two equivalence properties relevant in protocol analysis: static equivalence and trace equivalence. Both notions model the property that an attacker cannot distinguish between two protocol executions, and they have been used to model security goals such as off-line guessing, electronic voting anonymity, and RFID untraceability. Static equivalence is concerned with an attacker who passively eavesdrop on a network and then tries to distinguish between possible executions by performing off-line computations. Trace equivalence is used in the analysis of security properties against an attacker who may participate actively in protocol execution. We present an efficient decision procedure for static equivalence under equational theories generated by subterm convergent rewriting systems. This class of theories encompasses the most common cryptographic primitives, including symmetric and asymmetric encryption and decryption, hash functions and digital signatures. Our algorithm achieves a better asymptotic complexity than competing algorithms, albeit with a narrower scope. We discuss its implementation in the FAST tool and show that it indeed performs much more efficiently than other existing tools for the same task. We also present a procedure for deciding the trace equivalence of bounded simple processes under equational theories generated by convergent rewriting systems and for which a finitary unification algorithm exists. Although we do not have a termination result, our procedure is correct for the largest class of equational theories handled by any existing procedure for deciding trace equivalence and, together with the work by Cheval et. al [64], it is the only one to handle non-trivial else branches. Finally, we introduce a symbolic probabilistic framework for the analysis of security protocols. Our framework provides a general method for expressing weak-

A Logic of Belief and a Model Checking Algorithm for Security Protocols.

Belief Semantics of Authorization Logic

Model Checking Needham-Schroeder Security Protocol Based on Temporal Logic of Knowledge

Base-based Model Checking for Multi-Agent Only Believing (long version)

A logic of authentication

Equivalence Properties and Probabilistic Reasoning in Symbolic Security Protocol Analysis

Security Theorems via Model Theory

To know or not to know: epistemic approaches to security protocol verification

DeepSec: Deciding Equivalence Properties for Security Protocols -- Improved theory and practice

Neural Model Checking

Verifying Team Formation Protocols With Probabilistic Model Checking

Learning to Prove Safety over Parameterised Concurrent Systems (Full Version)

Combining Classical and Probabilistic Independence Reasoning to Verify the Security of Oblivious Algorithms (Extended Version)

Model Checking Theory in the View of Modal Logic

Heuristic Methods for Security Protocols

Model-Checking Linear-Time Properties of Quantum Systems

Regular Model Checking Approach to Knowledge Reasoning over Parameterized Systems (technical report)

Formal Verification of Quantum Protocols

Dynamic epistemic verification of security protocols: framework and case study

Conditional Belief, Knowledge and Probability

Machine-Checked Proofs For Realizability Checking Algorithms