Abstract:Assertions have been the de facto collateral for simulation-based and formal verification of hardware designs for over a decade. The quality of hardware verification, \ie, detection and diagnosis of corner-case design bugs, is critically dependent on the quality of the assertions. There has been a considerable amount of research leveraging a blend of data-driven statistical analysis and static analysis to generate high-quality assertions from hardware design source code and design execution trace data. Despite such concerted effort, all prior research struggles to scale to industrial-scale large designs, generates too many low-quality assertions, often fails to capture subtle and non-trivial design functionality, and does not produce any easy-to-comprehend explanations of the generated assertions to understand assertions' suitability to different downstream validation tasks. Recently, with the advent of Large-Language Models (LLMs), there has been a widespread effort to leverage prompt engineering to generate assertions. However, there is little effort to quantitatively establish the effectiveness and suitability of various LLMs for assertion generation. In this paper, we present AssertionBench, a novel benchmark to evaluate LLMs' effectiveness for assertion generation quantitatively. AssertioBench contains 100 curated Verilog hardware designs from OpenCores and formally verified assertions for each design generated from GoldMine and HARM. We use AssertionBench to compare state-of-the-art LLMs to assess their effectiveness in inferring functionally correct assertions for hardware designs. Our experiments demonstrate how LLMs perform relative to each other, the benefits of using more in-context exemplars in generating a higher fraction of functionally correct assertions, and the significant room for improvement for LLM-based assertion generators.

An assertion-based verification method for SystemC TLM

SoC performance modeling methodology and implementation basedon transaction dataflow

Verifying Aspect-Oriented Programs Using Open Temporal Logic

Cycle-Accurate Transaction Level Modeling and Communication Refinement Based on SystemC

AssertLLM: Generating and Evaluating Hardware Verification Assertions from Design Specifications via Multi-LLMs

Formal Verification of Probabilistic SystemC Models with Statistical Model Checking

A Survey on Transaction Level Modeling for System-on-Chip Design

AssertLLM: Generating Hardware Verification Assertions from Design Specifications via Multi-LLMs

Assertion-based performance analysis for OCP systems

Hierarchical Formal Verification Method based on Transactions

C Code Verification Based on the Extended Labeled Transition System Model

Application of SVA in Hardware functional verification

Property-classified Hybrid Verification Based on CDFG

System level specification and verification using Concurrent State Machines and COSMA environment

SAT-Based Software Verification

Verification of AADL Models with Timed Abstract State Machines

SystemC transaction level modeling and verification of IEEE 802.15.3 MAC

AssertionBench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Large-Language Models for Assertion Generation

Exploring design space using transaction level models

Scalable Verification Framework for C Program