Abstract:The study of community structures is a hot spot for many inhomogeneous networks. Modularity plays an important role in this area, because it is a criterion for community detection, and a basis for community detection algorithms. Although commonly used in papers concerning community structures, modularity is seldom fully studied. In this paper, we investigate problems with the properties of modularity as defined by Newman and we propose a modularity normalized for number of groups as well as a hybrid modularity that improves on properties that reflect the interactions among communities. We also illustrate the basic flowchart of a “bottom-up merging” community detection strategy based on the properties of modularity, and explore a detection algorithm inspired by hybrid modularity. 1.Introduction The central idea of “Community Structure” is widely used in the study of social, biological and technical networks, among others. It represents an important future direction of complex networks research. In order to evaluate community structure, several measurements based on network density have been developed. [9] Modularity is the characteristic of a system that has been partitioned into smaller subsystems which interact with each other. The “modularity” index Q proposed by Newman et al. [10-14] is a popular method for evaluating how good is a particular division of networks into communities, assuming they interact but do not overlap. It is not only a criterion for community detection, but also provides basic insights needed to explore other algorithms for community detection. [1,10,14] There has been a recent proliferation of community structure studies and algorithms for fast computation of community structure in large networks. [14-15] Modularity usually acts as an objective function in these algorithms and thus community structure detection is basically an optimization process for the objective function Q. There are several other recent algorithms to detect community structure that are representative of the modularity approach . A network can be represented as G(V, A), where { } 3 2 1 , , v v v V = represents the set of nodes in the network and A is the set of connections. Detecting community structure consists of dividing a network into m sub-networks m p Vp , 2 , 1 , = ∅ ≠ ,

Modified modularity and the corresponding community structure detecting algorithm

Community Structure Detecting Algorithm for Dynamic Networks Based on Modularity

An Algorithm for Detecting Community Structure of Social Networks Based on Prior Knowledge and Modularity.

Research on Modularity for Evaluating Community Structure

An Modularity-Based Overlapping Community Structure Detecting Algorithm

A Normalized and a Hybrid Modularity

Detection of Community Structure in Networks Based on Community Coefficients

A Modularity Degree Based Heuristic Community Detection Algorithm

Scalable Community Discovery of Large Networks

Local Modularity for Community Detection in Complex Networks

Community Detection via Maximization of Modularity and Its Variants

Modularity and community structure in networks.

Global vs local modularity for network community detection

A Method for Community Detection of Complex Networks Based on Hierarchical Clustering

A Genetic Algorithm with Local Search Strategy for Improved Detection of Community Structure

Development and Prospect on the Study of Community Structure

MuMod: A Micro-Unit Connection Approach for Hybrid-Order Community Detection

Network community detection using modularity density measures

Enhanced modularity-based community detection by random walk network preprocessing.

Local community detection algorithm based on local modularity density

Common Strategy to Improve Community Detection Performance Based on the Nodes' Property