Abstract:The study of community structures is a hot spot for many inhomogeneous networks. Modularity plays an important role in this area, because it is a criterion for community detection, and a basis for community detection algorithms. Although commonly used in papers concerning community structures, modularity is seldom fully studied. In this paper, we investigate problems with the properties of modularity as defined by Newman and we propose a modularity normalized for number of groups as well as a hybrid modularity that improves on properties that reflect the interactions among communities. We also illustrate the basic flowchart of a “bottom-up merging” community detection strategy based on the properties of modularity, and explore a detection algorithm inspired by hybrid modularity. 1.Introduction The central idea of “Community Structure” is widely used in the study of social, biological and technical networks, among others. It represents an important future direction of complex networks research. In order to evaluate community structure, several measurements based on network density have been developed. [9] Modularity is the characteristic of a system that has been partitioned into smaller subsystems which interact with each other. The “modularity” index Q proposed by Newman et al. [10-14] is a popular method for evaluating how good is a particular division of networks into communities, assuming they interact but do not overlap. It is not only a criterion for community detection, but also provides basic insights needed to explore other algorithms for community detection. [1,10,14] There has been a recent proliferation of community structure studies and algorithms for fast computation of community structure in large networks. [14-15] Modularity usually acts as an objective function in these algorithms and thus community structure detection is basically an optimization process for the objective function Q. There are several other recent algorithms to detect community structure that are representative of the modularity approach . A network can be represented as G(V, A), where { } 3 2 1 , , v v v V = represents the set of nodes in the network and A is the set of connections. Detecting community structure consists of dividing a network into m sub-networks m p Vp , 2 , 1 , = ∅ ≠ ,

Global vs local modularity for network community detection

Local Modularity for Community Detection in Complex Networks

Comparing Local Modularity Optimization for Detecting Communities in Networks

Multiscale Local Community Detection in Social Networks

Local community detection algorithm based on local modularity density

Modularity Optimization By Global-Local Search

Community detection in complex networks using extremal optimization modularity density

Detecting Overlapping Community Structures In Networks With Global Partition And Local Expansion

Multiple Resolution Community Structure Analysis

Generalized modularity measure for evaluating community structure in complex networks

Community Detection Based on Significance Optimization in Complex Networks.

Multi-resolution community detection based on generalized self-loop rescaling strategy

Extracting Local Community Structure from Local Cores.

Complex Network Structure Extraction Based on Community Relevance

Network community detection using modularity density measures

Community Detection Based on Symbiotic Organisms Search and Neighborhood Information

A Normalized and a Hybrid Modularity

Distributed Community Detection in Large Networks

Community Detection via Maximization of Modularity and Its Variants

Community detection on complex networks based on a new centrality indicator and a new modularity function

A Hybrid Strategy for Community Detection of Complex Networks.