Effect of Preparation Methods on Catalytic Properties of Ba-Doped Nano-Mgo-Supported Ru Catalyst for Ammonia Synthesis

Huo Chao,Zhang Xuehui,Xia Qinghua,Yang Xiazhen,Luo Yan,Liu Huazhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1088.2010.91028
2010-01-01
Abstract:Three Ru-based catalysts for ammonia synthesis were prepared by the conventional impregnation method (CI), ultrasound-coating method (UC), and ultrasound electrostatic adsorption (UEA). The physical and chemical properties of the supports and catalysts were characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray powder diffraction, N(2) physical adsorption, H(2) pulse chemical adsorption, and temperature-programmed reduction (TPR). The results showed that Ba was uniformly dispersed on the surface of the MgO support through its electrostatic adsorption in the catalyst prepared by UEA, which not only greatly improved the surface morphology of the support but also effectively controlled the size of Ru particles within the range 2-3 nm. TPR results also showed that the Ru-based catalyst prepared by UEA contained more BaCO(3) species that decomposed at low temperature and therefore gave a better reduction property. The highest catalytic activity for ammonia synthesis was obtained on the Ru-based catalyst prepared by UEA with a reaction rate of 60.42 mmol/(g.h) for ammonia synthesis under the conditions of 10 MPa, 10 000 h(-1), and 425 degrees C, which is 1.9 and 1.1 times that of Ru-based catalysts prepared by Cl and UC, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?