Abstract:BACKGROUND:Conventional serological, imaging and laboratory diagnosis methods for diagnosing periprosthetic infection are difficult to achieve ideal sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. In particular, the differential diagnosis of septic loosening and aseptic loosening in late stage after prosthetic replacement lacks of commonly accepted diagnostic criteria. The combination of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative diagnostic methods is of great significance in the identifying infection diagnosis and formulating renovation strategy. OBJECTIVE:To diagnose periprosthetic hip joint infection by combined use of preoperative 99Tcm triplephase bone scanning and intraoperative neutrophil count in frozen section analysis, and to compare with conventional diagnostic tools. METHODS:Between April 2008 and May 2013, 44 hip revision cases were enrol ed. Combined with clinical symptoms and serological examination, 18 cases whose erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein increased were considered as clinical y suspected infection group;26 cases with normal serological examination were considered as clinical y suspected aseptic loosening group. 99Tcm triplephase bone scanning was performed in al patients, and combined with intraoperative frozen section analysis. If both results were negative, the diagnosis was aseptic loosening and did one-stage revision surgery;otherwise, periprosthetic infection was detected and two-stage revision surgery was conducted. By postoperative fol ow-up serological indexes and surgery outcomes, statistics of work curve of subjects was used to evaluate the diagnostic values of 99Tcm triplephase bone scanning and frozen section analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:In 18 cases of clinical y suspected infection group, 16 cases of preoperative 99Tcm triplephase bone scanning and intraoperative frozen section results were positive, so two-stage revision surgeries were performed;2 cases with negative results received one-stage revision surgery after excluding infection. In 26 cases of clinical y suspected aseptic loosening group, 25 cases of preoperative 99Tcm three-phase bone scanning and intraoperative frozen section results were negative, and diagnosed as aseptic loosening, so one-stage revision surgery was performed. One patient affected infection of staphylococcus aureus in one-sample of the three samples in postoperative microbiological pathogen detection, and diagnosed as periprosthetic infection, so one-stage revision surgery was carried out. After combined use of 99Tcm triplephase bone scanning and intraoperative frozen section analysis, performance curve area increased from 0.906 to 0.972, sensitivity of diagnosis of infection increased from 89%to 94%, specificity of diagnosis of infection increased from 92%to 100%. However, no significant difference was detected in diagnostic methods. These data indicated that adding the method of 99Tcm triplephase bone scanning and intraoperative frozen section analysis technique, on the basis of serological and other conventional diagnostic tools, can differentiate infections from aseptic loosening of hip prosthesis. Negative results of 99Tcm triplephase bone scan showed high correlation between the diagnosis of aseptic loosening of the prosthesis and good diagnostic value to exclude infection. Combining with intraoperative frozen section method has a very good clinical value for the revision surgery.

Clinical significance of triple-phase bone scintigraphy in diagnosing peri-prosthetic infection following hip arthroplasty

Related factors and intervention analysis of periprosthetic infections in patients with total hip arthroplasty

Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and 99tcm Triplephase Bone Scanning for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Infection in Hip

Clinical significance of triple-phase bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of loosening and infection after arthroplasty

Differentiation of peri-prosthetic infection and aseptic loosening using quantitative analysis with Tc99m-MDP triple-phase bone scintigraphy

Partial Two?stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty

The Temporal Impact of Prosthesis Implantation and Semi-Quantitative Criteria on the Diagnostic Efficacy of Triple-Phase Bone Scanning for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Differentiation between peri-prosthetic infection and aseptic loosening using quantitative analysis of triphasic 99Tcm-MDP bone scintigraphy

Analysis of 99mTc triple-phaseisotope bone scanning results forasymptomatic patients after a mid-long term follow-up of hip arthroplasty

~(99m)Tc-MDP triple phase bone scintigraphy in differentiating aseptic loosening and septic loosening after joint replacement

Added value of three-phase bone scintigraphy combined with SPECT/CT for differential diagnosis of periprosthetic infection and prosthesis loosening

99Tcm-MDP imaging for the diagnosis of joint infection after total hip arthroplasty

Comparison of Diagnostic Criteria of Tc-99m-MDP Three-Phase Bone Scintigraphy to Identify Peri-Prosthetic Infection in Patients with Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty

The Use of Nuclear Imaging for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection after Knee and Hip Arthroplasties

Application of 68Ga-citrate PET/CT for differentiating periprosthetic joint infection from aseptic loosening after joint replacement surgery

Antigranulocyte scintigraphy in infected hip prosthesis: the diagnostic importance of delayed 20-24-h imaging and semiquantitative analysis

Prosthetic joint infections: radionuclide state-of-the-art imaging

Value of knee skin temperature and serum soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 level in the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection after total knee arthroplasty

The combinations of multiple factors to improve the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity after artificial joint infection

Microbiology of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infections in Surgically Revised Cases from 34 Centers in Mainland China

Combined Use of External Iliac Lymph Node Count and Bone Scintigraphy for PJI Diagnosis: A Prospective Study