Comparative Performance of Different Methods Used to Collect Tomato Plant Volatiles

Jin-Ping Shu,Di-Bing Sun,Shu-Sheng Liu
2010-01-01
Allelopathy Journal
Abstract:We compared 3-methods of volatiles collection [simultaneous distillation extract (SDE), dynamic headspace trapping (DHT), and headspace solid phase micro-extraction (HS-SPME)] for their efficacy in collecting the volatiles emitted from tomato plants. 25-components were identified from various volatile fractions and their percentages were calculated in the volatiles collected by each method. Mono- and sesquiterpenes were the major components of volatile blends, among them beta-phellandrene (28>50%) was most abundant, followed by beta-caryophyllene (4.5-18%) > (+) -2-carene (8-15%) > delta- elemene (2-15%)>alpha-caryophyllene (1-4%) in the SDE, DHT and HS-SPME volatile fractions. Both qualitative and quantitative differences were found in collections done by three methods. The total number of volatile components in SDE extract were higher than in DHT and HS-SPME extracts. HS-SPME was more efficient than both SDE and DHT, in collecting highly volatile compounds (such as mono- and sesquiterpenic terpenes), whereas, SDE was more efficient than DHT and HS-SPME in collecting low-volatile compounds (such as long chain hydrocarbons, ketones, acids and esters). SDE extraction involved damage to plant, which resulted in releases of green leaf volatiles. These results will be useful for selection of techniques for collection of volatiles from plants.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?