In vitro isolation and culture of olfactory ensheathing cells from rat olfactory mucosa and olfactory bulbs using modified Nash differential adhesion and arabinosylcytosin method

Hao Peng,Chang-tao Wan,Dong Yin,Jiang-hua Ming
2009-01-01
Abstract:Background: At present, commonly used culture method of olfactory ensheathing cells contain the differential adhesion method, chemical inhibition method, antibody affinity adsorption and anti-complement method. Each method has its advantage or disadvantage. Using a method alone can obtain a low purified rate. Objective: To in vitro harvest and purity rat olfactory ensheathing cells derived from olfactory bulb and olfactory mucosa using modified Nash differential adhesion and arabinosylcytosin method. Design, Time and Setting: The cytology in vitro controlled study was performed at the Laboratories of Department of Orthopaedics and, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from November 2007 to May 2008. Materials: Ten Sprague-Dawley rats aged 10 weeks old were obtained from Animal Experimental Center, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University. Arabinosylcytosin was supplied by Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Methods: Rat bilateral olfactory bulbs and olfactory mucosa at 1/3 nasal septum were obtained, sliced, digested in trypsin, and made into monoplast suspension. At 1×10 9/L, cells were incubated in uncoated 25 cm 2 culture flask. At 18-20 hours, cell suspension was moved into another uncoated 25 cm 2 culture flask (the first differential adhesion). At 24 hours, cell suspension was moved into a poly-D-lysine-coated 25 cm 2 culture flask or poly-D-lysine-coated 6-well culture plate (the second differential adhesion). At 48 hours, parenchyma cells were removed after a half of medium was changed. At 2-3 days after differential adhesion culture, 3.0-5.0 pmol/L arabinosylcytosin was added to remove remaining fibroblasts. Main Outcome Measures: Morphology, proliferation, and purification of olfactory ensheathing cells; Identification of olfactory ensheathing cells using immunofluorescence. Results: Olfactory bulb-derived olfactory ensheathing cells adhered to the wall at 24 hours. Olfactory mucosa-derived olfactory ensheathing cells adhered to the wall at 4-5 days. The morphology of the two kinds of cells was similar. Most of them were bipolar and spindle-shaped, and few were tripolar and flat. At 10 days, glial fibrillary acidic protein and nerve growth factor receptor 75 immunofluorescence and nerve growth factor p75+hoechs immunofluorescence showed many positive dipolar or mutipolar cell membrane, cell body and processes, resulting in an over 90% purified rate. Conclusion: High-purification olfactory bulb and olfactory mucosa-derived olfactory ensheathing cells can be collected by modified Nash differential adhesion and arabinosylcytosin method. The adherence time and proliferation degree of olfactory bulb-derived olfactory ensheathing cells are better than olfactory mucosa-derived olfactory ensheathing cells.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?