Abstract:Objective:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis from June 2016 to June 2018. These patients include 33 males and 82 females, ranging in age from 41 to 72 years, with a mean of (57±7) years. 56 cases (posterior interbody fusion group) were treated by intermuscular approach and 59 cases (oblique lateral interbody fusion group) were treated by oblique lateral approach and posterior pedicle screw fixation. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, imaging results, clinical results and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up with an average of (27±3) months (range from 12 to 48 months). The operative time and intraoperative blood loss of oblique lateral interbody fusion group were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (P<0.05). There was no incision infection and nerve injury were observed in two groups. Besides, the VAS score at 72 h after surgery of oblique lateral interbody fusion group (1.10±0.08) were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (1.51±0.15). According to the analysis of variance with repeated measures design, the difference between the posterior group and the oblique lateral fusion group was statistically significant in terms of lumbar lordosis angle and spondylolisthesis rate at postoperation and the last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between different groups in spondylolisthesis angle, sacral inclination angle and intervertebral space height. Both the two groups showed significant improvement in ODI during the final follow-up (P<0.05), but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the posterior fusion group was significantly higher than in the oblique lateral fusion group (P<0.05). The fusion rate of posterior interbody fusion group was 96.4% and 94.9% in oblique lateral interbody fusion group, while the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). During the follow-up, loosening, displacement, breakage of pedicle screw, displacement of intervertebral cages or obvious degeneration of adjacent segments were not observed.Conclusions:The posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and the oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation take well clinical results for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ ). Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation through intermuscular approach takes advantages of quick operation, less trauma, less bleeding, high safety, quick recovery and no interference to spinal canal, which can be a good choice for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).

Biomechanical changes of modified Scott wiring fixation in treating 12 young patients with lumbar Spondylolysis

A Modified Surgical Technique of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

GSS pedicle screw system and interbody autogenous iliac bone graft fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis

Comparative study of oblique lateral approach and posterior fusion in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis

Is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-level, low-grade, lumbar spondylolisthesis?

Development of a new screw with porous sides and its long-term efficacy for internal fixation of lumbar spondylolysis

Efficacy of One-Stage Posterior-Anterior Approach for Treatment of Severe Thoracolumbar Fractures

Risk factor analysis of disc and facet joint degeneration after intersegmental pedicle screw fixation for lumbar spondylolysis

Direct Repair of Symptomatic Lumbar Spondylolysis using Rod-Screw-Cable System

[Clinical Research of Percutaneous Monoplanar Screw Internal Fixation Via Injured Vertebrae for Thoracolumbar Fracture].

Surgical Reduction and Direct Repair Using Pedicle Screw-Rod-Hook Fixation in Adult Patients with Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

[360 Degrees Fixation of Lumbar Spine].

Single bypass fixation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: Anatomical insights and technical note

A comparison of the biomechanical properties of three different lumbar internal fixation methods in the treatment of lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis: finite element analysis

Retrospective Study of Combined Application of Interspinous Process Fixation System and Rigid Fixation System for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

U-Rod and Screw Construct Combined with Iliac Bone Grafting for Direct Repair of Teenager Mid-Lumbar Spondylolysis

Buck technique supplemented by temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation to repair lumbar spondylolysis in youth

Comparison of two internal fixation systems in lumbar spondylolysis by finite element methods

[Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis].

Biomechanical Analysis of Spinal Reconstruction after Total En Bloc Spondylectomy for Lower Lumbar Spine

Using the pedicle screw-U rod system for the treatment of double-level lumbar spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis