Abstract:Objective:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis from June 2016 to June 2018. These patients include 33 males and 82 females, ranging in age from 41 to 72 years, with a mean of (57±7) years. 56 cases (posterior interbody fusion group) were treated by intermuscular approach and 59 cases (oblique lateral interbody fusion group) were treated by oblique lateral approach and posterior pedicle screw fixation. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, imaging results, clinical results and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up with an average of (27±3) months (range from 12 to 48 months). The operative time and intraoperative blood loss of oblique lateral interbody fusion group were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (P<0.05). There was no incision infection and nerve injury were observed in two groups. Besides, the VAS score at 72 h after surgery of oblique lateral interbody fusion group (1.10±0.08) were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (1.51±0.15). According to the analysis of variance with repeated measures design, the difference between the posterior group and the oblique lateral fusion group was statistically significant in terms of lumbar lordosis angle and spondylolisthesis rate at postoperation and the last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between different groups in spondylolisthesis angle, sacral inclination angle and intervertebral space height. Both the two groups showed significant improvement in ODI during the final follow-up (P<0.05), but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the posterior fusion group was significantly higher than in the oblique lateral fusion group (P<0.05). The fusion rate of posterior interbody fusion group was 96.4% and 94.9% in oblique lateral interbody fusion group, while the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). During the follow-up, loosening, displacement, breakage of pedicle screw, displacement of intervertebral cages or obvious degeneration of adjacent segments were not observed.Conclusions:The posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and the oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation take well clinical results for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ ). Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation through intermuscular approach takes advantages of quick operation, less trauma, less bleeding, high safety, quick recovery and no interference to spinal canal, which can be a good choice for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).

Buck technique supplemented by temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation to repair lumbar spondylolysis in youth

Reduce the Fractured Central Endplate in Thoracolumbar Fractures Using Percutaneous Pedicle Screws and Instrumentational Maneuvers: Technical Strategy and Radiological Outcomes.

Multiclaw Cliplike Cervical Spinal Fixer and Bone Grafting in Management of Spondylolysis in Middle-aged and Old Patients

GSS pedicle screw system and interbody autogenous iliac bone graft fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis

U-Rod and Screw Construct Combined with Iliac Bone Grafting for Direct Repair of Teenager Mid-Lumbar Spondylolysis

Biportal endoscopic bone graft repair and percutaneous screw fixation for lumbar spondylolysis—technical note and clinical outcomes

[Clinical Research of Percutaneous Monoplanar Screw Internal Fixation Via Injured Vertebrae for Thoracolumbar Fracture].

Comparative study of oblique lateral approach and posterior fusion in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis

Development of a new screw with porous sides and its long-term efficacy for internal fixation of lumbar spondylolysis

Management of hangman’s fracture with percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation

Efficacy of One-Stage Posterior-Anterior Approach for Treatment of Severe Thoracolumbar Fractures

Surgical Reduction and Direct Repair Using Pedicle Screw-Rod-Hook Fixation in Adult Patients with Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

Direct Repair of Symptomatic Lumbar Spondylolysis using Rod-Screw-Cable System

Risk factor analysis of disc and facet joint degeneration after intersegmental pedicle screw fixation for lumbar spondylolysis

Monosegmental transpedicular fixation for selected patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Unilateral pedicle screw fixation of lumber spine: A safe internal fixation method

Comparison of two internal fixation systems in lumbar spondylolysis by finite element methods

Using the pedicle screw-U rod system for the treatment of double-level lumbar spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis

Pedicle screw internal fixation combined with intra-vertebral bone graft for thoracolumbar fractures

Optimizing the distal anchorage in stabilization for the traumatic adjacent lumbar vertebra fracture in an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient who had posterior spinal fusion: a novel surgical technique

[Minimal Invasive Internal Fixation with U-shaped Break-off Pedicle Screws for Treatent of Thoracolumbar Fractures].