Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the short-term precision and accuracy of bone mineral density (BMD) measured with quantitative CT (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in multi-centre clinical research with a European spine phantom (ESP).Methods:From January 2016 to April 2020, totally 40 CT scanners (12 Siemens from Germany, 12 Philips from Netherlands, 9 GE from US, 5 Toshiba from Japan, 2 United Imaging from China) and 53 DXA instruments (34 GE Lunar from US, 14 Hologic from US, 5 Medlink from France) used in multi-centre in China were enrolled. The CT equipment came from 31 centers and DXA equipment from 32 centers.Using Mindways QCT software, the ESP was scanned 10 times on each instrument with repositioning using standardized spine protocols with QCT and DXA. The BMD value of the three lumbar vertebrae with low, medium, high density and the mean BMD value were measured. Accuracy was assessed by comparing BMD values measured on each device with the actual value of the phantom. Short-term precision was calculated as the root-mean-square standard deviation (RMS-SD) and root-mean-square standard deviation coefficient of variation (RMS-%CV) for the repeated measurements. The repeated measures variance analysis was used to compare the differences in BMD between different devices.Results:The differences in BMD values were statistically significant among different CT and DXA devices.The ranges of the accuracy measured by different QCT devices were 1.20% to 7.60% for Siemens, -1.83% to 0.20% for Philips, 1.18% to 13.20% for GE, -0.12% to 3.55% for Toshiba, -1.65% to 6.32% for United Imaging, 6.59% to 21.34% for GE Lunar, -6.65% to 5.45% for Hologic, and -6.97% to -0.68% for Medlink, respectively. The RMS-%CV of all vertebral BMD values measured by QCT and DXA ranged from 0.38% to 3.85%. The RMS-SD of QCT was 0.54 to 2.45 mg/cm 3, of DXA was 0.009 to 0.037 g/cm 2. The RMS-%CV values of each vertebral body measured by different QCT and DXA devices decreased with the increase of BMD, while the RMS-SD values showed the opposite tendency. Conclusions:Based on ESP, the QCT and DXA devices have significant differences in lumbar spine BMD measurement. Comparing the measurement results among different devices requires cross-calibration. Overall, the accuracy and short-term precision are within a reasonable range, which can be used for clinical follow-up observation. The short-term precision error and accuracy error range of QCT in evaluating the density of ESP were slightly smaller than those of DXA.

An Automatic Method for Measurement of Vertebral Bone Density Based on QCT Without an External Reference Phantom

Research on BMD Measurement of Femoral Neck with No-External Reference Phantom CAD Based on QCT Data

Automated vertebral bone mineral density measurement with phantomless internal calibration in chest LDCT scans using deep learning

Bone Mineral Density at the Ankle Measured with Quantitative CT (QCT)

Accuracy of Phantomless Calibration of Routine Computed Tomography Scans for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in the Spine Clinic

Validation of Asynchronous Quantitative Bone Densitometry of the Spine: Accuracy, Short-Term Reproducibility, and a Comparison with Conventional Quantitative Computed Tomography

Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validation

The Accuracy of Bone Mineral Density Measurement Using Dual-Energy Spectral CT and Quantitative CT: a Comparative Phantom Study

Using an artificial intelligence algorithm to assess the bone mineral density of the vertebral bodies based on computed tomography data

Evaluation of precision and accuracy of bone mineral densitometry

A preliminary study of the correlation and agreement of bone mineral density measurements between rapid-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT and QCT

Correction of QCT Vbmd Using MRI Measurements of Marrow Adipose Tissue

Accuracy and precision of volumetric bone mineral density assessment using dual-source dual-energy versus quantitative CT: a phantom study

Influence of Contrast Media on Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Measurements from Routine Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Datasets using a Phantom-less BMD Measurement Tool.

A New 3D Segmentation Methodology for Lumbar Vertebral Bodies for the Measurement of BMD and Geometry

Accuracy, Linearity and Precision of Spine QCT Vbmd Phantom Measurements for Different Brands of CT Scanner: A Multicentre Study

The Accurate Relationship Between Spine Bone Density and Bone Marrow in Humans

Quantitative assessment of areal bone mineral density using multi-energy localizer radiographs from photon-counting detector CT

Validation of Opportunistic Artificial Intelligence-based Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Coronary Artery Calcium Scans

Effect of abdominal adipose content on spine phantom bone mineral density measured by rapid kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT and quantitative CT

Multi-site phantomless bone mineral density from clinical quantitative computed tomography in males