Corneal imaging by slit lamp adapted optical coherence tomography after keratoplasty

Qihua Le,Jianjiang Xu,Chaoran Zhang,Jiaxu Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2008.04.013
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective: The observation of the healing process of graft after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or deep lamellar posterior endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) was rather difficult by the equipments available up to now. The slit lamp adapted optical coherence tomography (SL-OCT) could provide in vivo, in situ, cross-sectional images of cornea with high resolution and noninvasiveness. The aim of current study was to apply SL-OCT to observe the healing process of graft after PKP and DLEK. Methods: PKP and DLEK was performed on the unilateral eyes of 16 and 10 patients respectively. The healing process of corneal graft was observed with slit lamp adapted optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg SL-OCT). The fellow eyes were as control eyes. Results: A fine adaptive relationship between graft and recipient bed was found in 9 eyes, and the grafts were thinner in 5 eyes and thicker in 2 eyes in PKP group, 4 eyes of which occurred synechia. In DLEK group, the majority (9 eyes) had excellent engomphosis between graft and recipient bed, including a little bit thicker graft in 4 cases and graft edge curling in 1 eye. The corneal thickness of the fellow eyes was (552.29 ± 31.99) μm, and that in PKP and DLEK groups was (613.79 ± 120.3) μm and (670 ± 225.2) μm respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (Z = 16.379, P = 0.000). The anterior chamber depth of the fellow eyes was (2.62 ± 0.37) mm, and that in PKP and DLEK groups was (2.27 ± 0.88) mm and (2.96 ± 0.73) mm respectively without statistically significant difference among them (Z = 3.347, P = 0.197). In the bilateral keratoconus eyes, the corneal thickness was (574.5 ± 21.8) μm and (406.5 ± 64.1) μm, and the anterior chamber depth was (3.12 ± 0.04) mm and (3.46 ± 0.23) mm in operation eyes and nonoperation eyes respectively, presenting a evident difference between them (t = 13.276, P = 0.001; t = 6.756, P = 0.034). Conclusion: SL-OCT is a good tool during the follow-up in keratoplasty patients. It is crucial in observing the healing process and postoperative complications as early as possible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?