Descemetic Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in Advanced Keratoconus: Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes
Leopoldo Spadea,Lucia Di Genova,Edoardo Trovato Battagliola,Stefano Scordari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s441577
2024-02-16
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Abstract:Leopoldo Spadea, Lucia Di Genova, Edoardo Trovato Battagliola, Stefano Scordari Eye Clinic, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy Correspondence: Leopoldo Spadea, Head Eye Clinic, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of RomeVia Benozzo Gozzoli 34, Rome, 00142, Italy, Tel +39065193220, Fax +390688657818, Email Purpose: To assess and contrast the visual and refractive results of Descemetic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in the treatment of advanced keratoconus. Design: Retrospective, comparative, interventional study. Methods: This study enrolled eyes affected by keratoconus with preoperative mean keratometry ≥ 60 diopters (D) that were treated with either Descemetic DALK (30 eyes) or PK (29 eyes) by using always the same corneal diameters (8.00mm recipient; 8.25mm donor cornea) and the same suture technique (10– 0 nylon double-running 12-bites continuous suture). The outcome measures were postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), subjective refractive astigmatism (SRAst), and keratometric astigmatism at 3mm area (SimK), spherical equivalent (SEq). Results: Postoperative visual acuity significantly improved in both groups. Mean CDVA was higher in the DALK group 3 months (DALK 0.61, PK 0.42, p< 0.05), 6 months (DALK 0.69, PK 0.44, p< 0.05), and 12 months (DALK 0.72, PK 0.45, p 0.05). Final SRAst and SimK also were comparable between the two groups (respectively DALK 2.97, PK:2.81, p> 0.05; DALK 3.91, PK 2.37, p> 0.05). No significant statistical differences were noted for UCVA and SEq data during the entire follow-up period between the two groups. Conclusion: Both methods of corneal transplantation resulted in a notable enhancement of visual and refractive outcomes in eyes afflicted by advanced keratoconus. Descemetic DALK demonstrated superior visual acuity before suture removal, whereas DALK and PK exhibited comparable results in terms of visual acuity, refractive correction, and keratometric astigmatism after suture removal. Keywords: astigmatism, corneal topography, descemetic dalk, keratoconus, PK Keratoconus is a condition characterized by progressive thinning and steepening of the cornea, resulting in irregular astigmatism and reduced visual acuity. Initially thought to be noninflammatory, recent research suggests a link with ocular inflammation. 1 It typically manifests in the second and third decades of life, affecting both sexes and all ethnicities. Prevalence ranges from 0.2 to 4790 per 100,000 individuals, with higher rates among 20- to 30-year-olds and certain ethnic groups, particularly those of Middle Eastern and Asian descent. 2 Histopathologically, progressive stromal thinning and ectasia of the central cornea are common findings. Risk factors include a family history of the condition, eye rubbing, eczema, asthma, and allergies. Early detection remains challenging, with corneal topography being the primary diagnostic tool. However, in early stages, additional measures such as corneal pachymetry and higher order aberration data are often necessary. Classification of keratoconus severity and progression involves morphological features, ocular signs, and index-based systems. Treatment varies depending on severity, ranging from spectacles for mild cases to scleral contact lenses for moderate ones. Severe cases may require corneal surgery, while mild to moderate progressive keratoconus can often be managed with corneal cross-linking. 2 Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) has been one of the main surgical treatment options for the management of keratoconus. 3,4 In long-term follow-up studies, PK has evidenced good results, irrespective of graft size. 4 However, 18 to 34% of patients develop an immunological rejection after PK, with consequent endothelial cell loss and graft failure. 5,6 Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is a good alternative when the pathology is localized in the anterior stroma with an unaffected endothelium. 7 Even though DALK is generally a more time-consuming procedure compared to PK, it is considered to be associated with fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications. The risk for iris prolapse, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, choroidal effusion, endophthalmitis, or graft rejection is significantly lower. 8–10 Furthermore, as compared to PK, post-DALK globes are more resistant to blunt trauma, steroid treatments can be used for a shorter period, and sutures can be removed earlier, as -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services