Comparison of different harvesting technique for Descemet membrane-corneal endothelial cells complex

Xiangyu Ye,Yaohua Sheng,Xiuli Zhou,Guoqing Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2008.09.002
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective: The possible restoration of the visual performance of corneal endothelial disorder may be obtained by selective transplantation of only Descemet membrane and endothelium, but preparation of the donor tissue is more challenging. Present paper was to evaluate the effect of different harvesting technique for Descemet membrane-corneal endothelial cells complex (DM + CECs). Methods: Forty eyes from 20 New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into four groups according to the surgical procedures: the stripping, hydrodissection, big-bubble and mechanical group and each group consisted of 10 eyes. The DM + CECs were analyzed using vital staining for endothelium and standard histological preparation. Results: Harvesting success were in 2 eyes for stripping group, 8 eyes for hydrodissection group, 5 eyes for big-bubble group and 3 eyes for mechanical group, showing a significant difference in success rate among four group (P < 0.05). The endothelial cells survival rate (ESR) of hydrodissection group(98.03 ± 2.18%) and big-bubble group(97.14 ± 3.04%) was significantly higher than that of stripping group(80.16 ± 5.21%) and mechanical group (71.56 ± 9.57%) with a significant difference (F = 436.04, P < 0.05). The alizarin red/trypan blue staining showed that CECs remained the original morphology with slight damage in hydrodissection and big-bubble groups. Conclusion: The hydrodissection and big-bubble technique appear to be safe and effective for harvesting DM + CECs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?