Occluder implanting location and arrhythmia after transcatheter occlusion for ventricular septal defect

Qi-lian Xie,Jun Wang,Bao-yong Yan,Zeng-ren Zhao,Lei Gao,Zhen Wang,Mi-lin Zheng,Jin Zhou,Wen-feng Fan,Kun-shen Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.09.011
2008-01-01
Abstract:AIM: Arrhythmia is one of the serious complications after transcatheter occlusion for ventricular septal defect (VSD). At present, there is still no effective preventive treatment for it. In this study, we investigated whether occluder implanting into ventricular septal aneurysms can prevent occurrence of severe arrhythmia after transcatheter closure of aneurysm-like VSD. METHODS: From January 2002 to June 2007, 1 810 VSD patients were treated in the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Of them, six hundred and forty four patients were treated by occluder implantation. According to whether the left plate of occluder crossing the left ventricular base (LVB) or not, they were subdivided into VSA-body-implantation group and LVB-implantation group. Surgical treatment was performed in 1 166 patients. Rigorous integrated medical monitoring lasted for one week after surgery. Electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiography (TTE) were performed before and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after discharging. RESULTS: ①In occluder-implantation group, the incidence rates of third degree atrioventricular (A-V) block and complete left bundle branch block were higher than in surgery group (P < 0.05), but the incidence of second degree A-V block was lower than in surgery group (P < 0.05). ②For aneurysm-like VSD, the incidence rates of third degree A-V block and complete left bundle branch block were higher in occluder-implantation group than in surgery group (P < 0.05); If the occluder was placed into VSA, the incidence rates of third and second degree A-V block and complete left bundle branch block were significantly lower than in LVB-implantation group (P < 0.05) and LVB-implantation-without-VSA group and surgery group (whether with VSA formation or not) (P < 0.05). ③For surgery group, no statistically significant difference in arrhythmia incidence was observed between VSA formation group and non-VSA formation group (P > 0.05). ④After occluder implantation, platelet adhesion was reduced, and coagulation function, immune system reaction (immunoglobulin, complement), reendothelialization on material surface were normal. No host response such as inflammation was found. No occluder dislocation or other material response was found either. CONCLUSION: ①Occluder implantation into VSA body can effectively reduce the incidence of serious arrhythmia after transcatheter closure of aneurysm-like VSD. ②It is necessary to pay special attention to avoid the oversizing and deformation of occluder when closing LVB of VSD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?