Abstract:Brain–computer interface (BCI) based on a novel action observation (AO) paradigm can simultaneously induce steady-state motion visual evoked potential (SSMVEP) from the occipital area and sensory motor rhythm from the sensorimotor area. This unique double effect has great potentials in stroke rehabilitation. On the other hand, the asynchronous BCIs allow users to switch freely between intentional control (IC) and nonintentional control (NC) states. However, achieving lower latency and higher detecting accuracy are still a challenge. Unlike previous asynchronous SSMVEP BCI studies, which distinguish the IC and NC states by analyzing SSMVEP, the current study identified IC from NC by detecting the motion onset visual evoked potential (mVEP) induced by the designed AO stimulus. As a direct result, significantly lower latency was achieved, while high overall classification accuracy was maintained. The EEG data in 18 seniors responding to the designed AO stimuli were analyzed, temporally and spatially. Principal component analysis (PCA) followed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) method ( ), the multifeatures from discrete wavelet transform (DWT) followed by support vector machine (SVM) method, and the discriminative canonical pattern matching (DCPM) method were investigated to classify the mVEP period and the non-mVEP period in single trial, and the method was utilized to detect the mVEP. The performance of detecting mVEP in asynchronous mode was compared with the performance of detecting the SSMVEP utilizing the convolutional neural network (CNN). Results showed that the mVEPs elicited by the AO stimulus had a positive deflection (P1) and a negative deflection (N2) within 300 ms of the motion onset. Furthermore, the method achieved the highest classification accuracy, i.e., 79.688% ± 7.866%, and no significant difference in the classification accuracy between the senior group and young group. The latency to detect the mVEP utilizing the method was only 266.1 ± 28.6 ms, which was significantly lower than the latency to detect the SSMVEP by utilizing CNN. Overall, the current study provides an approach to significantly improve the feasibility of low latency asynchronous BCI.

A Brain Computer Interface Based on Motion-Onset VEPs

A brain-computer interface using motion-onset visual evoked potential.

Progress in Brain-computer Interface Based on Cortical Evoked Potential

An Online Brain–computer Interface Using Non-Flashing Visual Evoked Potentials

Progress in Brain-Computer Interface Based on Spontaneous EEG

A Single-Stimulus, Multitarget BCI Based on Retinotopic Mapping of Motion-Onset VEPs

Functional Interface Between Brain and Central Pattern Generator for Application in Human-Machine System.

Bi-Directional Visual Motion Based Bci Speller

Visual Motion Onset Brain-computer Interface

Brain-computer interfaces based on visual evoked potentials.

VEP-based Brain-Computer Interfaces: Time, Frequency, and Code Modulations [research Frontier].

A High-Speed BCI Based on Code Modulation VEP.

A P300 Based Online Brain-Computer Interface System for Virtual Hand Control

Evaluation of Different Visual Feedback Methodsfor Brain—Computer Interfaces (BCI) Based on Code-Modulated Visual Evoked Potentials (cVEP)

A Novel SSVEP Brain-Computer Interface System Based on Simultaneous Modulation of Luminance and Motion.

An Online Brain-Computer Interface in Mobile Virtual Reality Environments

A user-friendly visual brain-computer interface based on high-frequency steady-state visual evoked fields recorded by OPM-MEG

A Study of c-VEP/SSVEP BCI Hybrid System

A Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Based on Visual Evoked Potential and Pupillary Response

The hybrid BCI system for movement control by combining motor imagery and moving onset visual evoked potential

Low-Latency Asynchronous BCI by Detecting the Motion Onset VEP Induced by the Action Observation Stimulus in Senior