Abstract:Code-modulated visual evoked potentials (c-VEPs) are an innovative control signal utilized in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) with promising performance. Prior studies on steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) have indicated that the spatial frequency of checkerboard-like stimuli influences both performance and user experience. Spatial frequency refers to the dimensions of the individual squares comprising the visual stimulus, quantified in cycles (i.e., number of black-white squares pairs) per degree of visual angle. However, the specific effects of this parameter on c-VEP-based BCIs remain unexplored. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate the role of spatial frequency of checkerboard-like visual stimuli in a c-VEP-based BCI. Sixteen participants evaluated selection matrices with eight spatial frequencies: C001 (0 c/°, 1×1 squares), C002 (0.15 c/°, 2×2 squares), C004 (0.3 c/°, 4×4 squares), C008 (0.6 c/°, 8×8 squares), C016 (1.2 c/°, 16×16 squares), C032 (2.4 c/°, 32×32 squares), C064 (4.79 c/°, 64×64 squares), and C128 (9.58 c/°, 128×128 squares). These conditions were tested in an online spelling task, which consisted of 18 trials each conducted on a 3×3 command interface. In addition to accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR), subjective measures regarding comfort, ocular irritation, and satisfaction were collected. Significant differences in performance and comfort were observed based on different stimulus spatial frequencies. Although all conditions achieved mean accuracy over 95% after 2.1 s of trial duration, C016 stood out in terms user experience. The proposed condition not only achieved a mean accuracy of 96.53% and 164.54 bits/min with a trial duration of 1.05s, but also was reported to be significantly more comfortable than the traditional C001 stimulus. Since both features are key for BCI development, higher spatial frequencies than the classical black-to-white stimulus might be more adequate for c-VEP systems. Hence, we assert that the spatial frequency should be carefully considered in the development of future applications for c-VEP-based BCIs.

Evaluation of Different Visual Feedback Methodsfor Brain—Computer Interfaces (BCI) Based on Code-Modulated Visual Evoked Potentials (cVEP)

Progress in Brain-computer Interface Based on Cortical Evoked Potential

A high-performance SSVEP-based BCI using imperceptible flickers

Brain–computer interfaces based on code-modulated visual evoked potentials (c-VEP): a literature review

VEP-based Brain-Computer Interfaces: Time, Frequency, and Code Modulations [research Frontier].

Influence of spatial frequency in visual stimuli for cVEP-based BCIs: evaluation of performance and user experience

Brain-computer interfaces based on visual evoked potentials.

A High-Speed BCI Based on Code Modulation VEP.

An Online Brain–computer Interface Using Non-Flashing Visual Evoked Potentials

Highly Interactive Brain–Computer Interface Based on Flicker-Free Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential

A brain-computer interface using motion-onset visual evoked potential.

A c-VEP BCI System for Psychological Experiments

A 120-Target Brain-Computer Interface Based on Code-Modulated Visual Evoked Potentials.

Stimulus Design for Visual Evoked Potential Based Brain-Computer Interfaces

A combined brain-computer interface based on P300 potentials and motion-onset visual evoked potentials.

An Adaptive Motion-Onset VEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface

An Online Brain-Computer Interface Using Dynamically Detected Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials

A Brain-Computer Interface Based on Miniature-Event-Related Potentials Induced by Very Small Lateral Visual Stimuli.

Review of Brain–computer Interface Based on Steady‐state Visual Evoked Potential

A Chromatic Transient Visual Evoked Potential Based Encoding/Decoding Approach for Brain–Computer Interface

High-performance cVEP-BCI under minimal calibration