Abstract:The popularity of Android platform on mobile devices has attracted much attention from many developers and researchers, as well as malware writers. Recently, Jamrozik et al. proposed a technique to secure Android applications referred to as mining sandboxes. They used an automated test case generation technique to explore the behavior of the app under test and then extracted a set of sensitive APIs that were called. Based on the extracted sensitive APIs, they built a sandbox that can block access to APIs not used during testing. However, they only evaluated the proposed technique with benign apps but not investigated whether it was effective in detecting malicious behavior of malware that infects benign apps. Furthermore, they only investigated one test case generation tool (i.e., Droidmate) to build the sandbox, while many others have been proposed in the literature. In this work, we complement Jamrozik et al.'s work in two ways: (1) we evaluate the effectiveness of mining sandboxes on detecting malicious behaviors; (2) we investigate the effectiveness of multiple automated test case generation tools to mine sandboxes. To investigate effectiveness of mining sandboxes in detecting malicious behaviors, we make use of pairs of malware and benign app it infects. We build a sandbox based on sensitive APIs called by the benign app and check if it can identify malicious behaviors in the corresponding malware. To generate inputs to apps, we investigate five popular test case generation tools: Monkey, Droidmate, Droidbot, GUIRipper, and PUMA. We conduct two experiments to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of these test case generation tools on detecting malicious behavior. In the first experiment, we select 10 apps and allow test case generation tools to run for one hour; while in the second experiment, we select 102 pairs of apps and allow the test case generation tools to run for one minute. Our experiments highlight that 75.5%-77.2% of malware in our dataset can be uncovered by mining sandboxes - showing its power to protect Android apps. We also find that Droidbot performs best in generating test cases for mining sandboxes, and its effectiveness can be further boosted when coupled with other test case generation tools.

Novel sandbox for executing malicious code

A Sandbox System in Linux Kernel

Towards Mining Comprehensive Android Sandboxes.

Mining Sandboxes: Are We There Yet?

Ubox: A Lightweight and Hardware-assisted Sandbox for Multicore Embedded Systems

Hybrid User-level Sandboxing of Third-party Android Apps.

AirBag: Boosting Smartphone Resistance to Malware Infection.

Non Executable Directory in Linux/UNIX Environment

DIVILAR: diversifying intermediate language for anti-repackaging on android platform.

EnvFaker - A Method to Reinforce Linux Sandbox Based on Tracer, Filter and Emulator Against Environmental-Sensitive Malware.

Practical and Effective Sandboxing for Linux Containers

Virtual Browser: A Virtualized Browser To Sandbox Third-Party Javascripts With Enhanced Security

Mining Sandboxes for Linux Containers

Mwsandbox: On Improving The Efficiency Of Automated Coarse-Grained Dynamic Malware Analysis

Virtual Browser: A Web-Level Sandbox To Secure Third-Party Javascript Without Sacrificing Functionality

Enter Sandbox: Android Sandbox Comparison

Building Dynamic System Call Sandbox with Partial Order Analysis

State-based Sandbox Tool for Distributed Malware Detection with Avoid Techniques

POW-HOW: An enduring timing side-channel to evade online malware sandboxes

Commercial hypervisor-based task sandboxing mechanisms are unsecured? But we can fix it!

Unleashing Unprivileged eBPF Potential with Dynamic Sandboxing