Abstract:The popularity of Android platform on mobile devices has attracted much attention from many developers and researchers, as well as malware writers. Recently, Jamrozik et al. proposed a technique to secure Android applications referred to as mining sandboxes. They used an automated test case generation technique to explore the behavior of the app under test and then extracted a set of sensitive APIs that were called. Based on the extracted sensitive APIs, they built a sandbox that can block access to APIs not used during testing. However, they only evaluated the proposed technique with benign apps but not investigated whether it was effective in detecting malicious behavior of malware that infects benign apps. Furthermore, they only investigated one test case generation tool (i.e., Droidmate) to build the sandbox, while many others have been proposed in the literature. In this work, we complement Jamrozik et al.'s work in two ways: (1) we evaluate the effectiveness of mining sandboxes on detecting malicious behaviors; (2) we investigate the effectiveness of multiple automated test case generation tools to mine sandboxes. To investigate effectiveness of mining sandboxes in detecting malicious behaviors, we make use of pairs of malware and benign app it infects. We build a sandbox based on sensitive APIs called by the benign app and check if it can identify malicious behaviors in the corresponding malware. To generate inputs to apps, we investigate five popular test case generation tools: Monkey, Droidmate, Droidbot, GUIRipper, and PUMA. We conduct two experiments to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of these test case generation tools on detecting malicious behavior. In the first experiment, we select 10 apps and allow test case generation tools to run for one hour; while in the second experiment, we select 102 pairs of apps and allow the test case generation tools to run for one minute. Our experiments highlight that 75.5%-77.2% of malware in our dataset can be uncovered by mining sandboxes - showing its power to protect Android apps. We also find that Droidbot performs best in generating test cases for mining sandboxes, and its effectiveness can be further boosted when coupled with other test case generation tools.

Mwsandbox: On Improving The Efficiency Of Automated Coarse-Grained Dynamic Malware Analysis

Malton: Towards On-Device Non-Invasive Mobile Malware Analysis for ART.

Mining Sandboxes: Are We There Yet?

Design and Implementation of an Automated Malware Dynamic Analysis System

Towards Mining Comprehensive Android Sandboxes.

Redefining Malware Sandboxing: Enhancing Analysis Through Sysmon and ELK Integration

POW-HOW: An enduring timing side-channel to evade online malware sandboxes

EnvFaker - A Method to Reinforce Linux Sandbox Based on Tracer, Filter and Emulator Against Environmental-Sensitive Malware.

Design and Implementation of Malware Automated Analysis Tool Based on Behavior Analysis

Unmasking the Shadows: Pinpoint the Implementations of Anti-Dynamic Analysis Techniques in Malware Using LLM

Dynamic Analysis of Malicious Code

Malware Dynamic Analysis Evasion Techniques: A Survey

State-based Sandbox Tool for Distributed Malware Detection with Avoid Techniques

Agent-based Vs Agent-less Sandbox for Dynamic Behavioral Analysis

Exploring the Use of Static and Dynamic Analysis to Improve the Performance of the Mining Sandbox Approach for Android Malware Identification

Enter Sandbox: Android Sandbox Comparison

On the Effectiveness of Binary Emulation in Malware Classification

SoK: An Essential Guide For Using Malware Sandboxes In Security Applications: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Lessons Learned

AmandaSystem: A new framework for static and dynamic Android malware analysis

Precise system-wide concatic malware unpacking

Method of Malware Behavior Analysis in Disassembly Level