Comparative Genomic and Phylogenetic Analysis of Forty Gentiana Chloroplast Genomes
Gang Deng,Ran-Ran Gao,Wen-Ting Wang,Tian-Ze Wu,Yong-Ping Zhang,Bo Wang,Li Xiang,Xia Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2708236
IF: 3.1
2022-08-09
Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark
Abstract:BACKGROUND: <i>Gentiana</i> plants<i>,</i> which have great medicinal and ornamental value, are widely distributed in diverse habitats and have complex taxonomy. Here 40 <i>Gentiana</i> chloroplast genomes were used for comparative genomic analysis and divergence time estimation.METHODS: The complete chloroplast genome of <i>G. rhodantha</i> was sequenced, assembled, and annotated. Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis were provided for variation analysis of <i>Gentiana</i>.RESULTS: <i>Gentiana</i> species satisfy the characteristics of intra-Sect conservation and inter-Sect variation in chloroplast genome structure and IR boundaries. All <i>Gentiana</i> Sects can be clustered into a single one and separated from each other; however, <i>Ser. Apteroideae</i> and <i>Ser. Confertifoliae</i> in <i>Sect. Monopodiae</i> are more closely related to <i>Sect. Frigida</i> and <i>Sect. Cruciata</i>, respectively. <i>Gentiana</i> has experienced two large gene loss events; the first, the collective loss of the <i>rps16</i> gene at genus formation and the second, the collective loss of the <i>ndh</i> gene when <i>Ser. Ornatae</i> and <i>Ser. Verticillatae</i> completed their differentiation. Comparative genomic analysis support that <i>Sect. Stenogyne</i> and <i>Sect. Otophora</i> became the independent genera <i>Metagentiana</i> and <i>Kuepferia</i>. Seven divergence hotspot regions were screened based on Pi values, and could serve as DNA-specific barcodes for <i>Gentiana</i>.CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a further theoretical basis for taxonomic analysis, genetic diversity, evolutionary mechanism and molecular identification in <i>Gentiana</i>.
cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology