Underestimated incidence rate of shigellosis: comparison of PCR and coproculture methods in a surveillance study

Song-mei WANG,Zhi-yong HAO,Jing-chen MA,Lin Du,Xuan-yi WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2006.06.013
2006-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: To define the magnitude of potential underestimate of disease burden due to shigellosis. Methods: PCR was applied to detect Shigella infection compared to coproculture. Rectal swab specimens of 39 Shigella culture positive and 298 Shigella culture negative patients from a population-based surveillance were selected randomly. Both conventional culture and real-time PCR with primer pair targeted to the invasion plasmid antigen H gene sequence (ipaH) were employed to conduct those randomized specimens. Results: Shigella. spp was isolated from 39 (11.6%) of 337 stool specimens by conventional coproculture. Conversely, ipaH were detected in 212 (62.9%) of 337 randomly stool specimens (P<0.001). A logistic regression analysis found culture results was the strongest predictive factor for PCR positive (OR = 15.5; 95% CI: 2.0 - 119.0), followed by diarrhea with fever (OR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2-6.2), epidemic season (OR = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.4-4.3), female gender (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-3.0). Conclusions: The high detection rate of ipaH through real-time PCR indicated the incidence rate of shigellosis diagnosed by conventional culture might cause a considerable underestimation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?