Abstract:We studied sexual differences in morphology and echolocation calls in five bat species, which included three species of CF FM bats ( Rhinolophus cornutus, Aselliscus wheeleri, Hipposideros armiger ) and two species of FM bats ( Myotis myotis and M. ricketti ). The five bat species (a total of 95 bats) were captured in June 2000 and May and June 2002 in the caves in four districts including Zhenfeng, Zhenning, Anlong and Xishui in Guizhou Province, China. Bats were captured at the entrance of caves with the mist nets at about 8 pm (the time when bats usually flied out of caves to hunt preys), and then were put into a recording room near the capture locations to allow them to fly freely. About 2 hours later, the recording was carried out by an ultrasound detector (with frequencies down to 5 kHz and up to 205 kHz, D980) which was pointed to the head of the bats when they flied to the microphone directly and echolocation calls were recorded when the bats were about 1 meter away from the microphone. The echolocation calls were stored in a memory array (12 s real time), read out at one tenth of the original speed and recorded with a digital sound recorder (TCD D8, sampling rate of 44 10 or 22 05 kHz, frequency response range: 30-20 000 Hz). Each bat was recorded for 5 to 10 times. The recorded echolocation signals were analyzed with a sound processing software, Batsound 3 10 (developed by Pettersson Elektronik AB, Sweden) on a computer. The ultrasound analysis included color sonagram (frequency time graph) with FFT of 256 Hz and the Hanning window was used. The analysis attenuation was 60 dB. The pulse duration, pulse interval (from the beginning of one pulse to the beginning of the next pulse), frequency bandwidth (FB) and dominant frequency (DF) of the echolocation calls were measured. The morphological features such as body mass, body length, forearm length, tail length, feet length (together with the claws) were measured with balance and ruler. Statistical analysis such as calculating mean value, standard error and independent samples t test were performed using statistical software SPSS 11 5 Our studies showed that these five bat species do not show sexual differences in morphology. However, significant sexual differences in the dominant frequency of echolocation calls were found in four bat species. While the dominant frequency component of echolocation calls was higher in female than in male R. cornutus , the opposite was found in A. wheeleri, H. armiger , and M. ricketti , and no significant difference in echolocation calls of female and male M. myotis was found. It was concluded that within the same bat species it was sex, not body size that determined the dominant frequency. Together with the other bat species which have been researched on their sexual difference in morphology and echolocation calls, we can infer that in Rhinolophidae, the female bats have higher dominant frequency than the male ones; in Hipposideridae, the female bats have lower dominant frequency than the male ones; in Vespertilionidae, some bat species have significant sexual difference and in these species the female bats have lower dominant frequency than the male ones, but some bat species have not significant difference.

Vocal Communication in Adult Greater Horseshoe Bats, Rhinolophus Ferrumequinum

Greater Horseshoe Bats Recognize the Sex and Individual Identity of Conspecifics from Their Echolocation Calls

Universal patterns and differences in graded aggressive calls of greater horseshoe bats from distant populations

Behavioural and Neurobiological Implications of Linear and Non-Linear Features in Larynx Phonations of Horseshoe Bats

Doppler-shift Compensation Behavior in Horseshoe Bats Revisited: Auditory Feedback Controls Both a Decrease and an Increase in Call Frequency.

Development of the hyolaryngeal architecture in horseshoe bats: insights into the evolution of the pulse generation for laryngeal echolocation

Relationship Between Echolocation Calls and Age in the Bat Species of Rhinolophus Pearsoni

Everyday bat vocalizations contain information about emitter, addressee, context, and behavior

Bats increase vocal amplitude and decrease vocal complexity to mitigate noise interference during social communication

Echolocation call frequency variation in horseshoe bats: molecular basis revealed by comparative transcriptomics

Sex Differences in Cochlear Transcriptomes in Horseshoe Bats

Vocalisations indicate behavioural type in bats

Chromosome-level genome and population genomics of the intermediate horseshoe bat ( Rhinolophus affinis) reveal the molecular basis of virus tolerance in Rhinolophus and echolocation call frequency variation

Sex ratio potentially influence the complexity of social calls in Himalayan leaf-nosed bat groups

Vocal Repertoire of Free-Ranging Adult Golden Snub-Nosed Monkeys (rhinopithecus Roxellana).

Role of auditory feedback for vocal production learning in the Egyptian fruit bat

Echolocation and Acoustic Communication in Bats

Comparative anatomy of the vocal apparatus in bats and implications for the diversity of laryngeal echolocation

Social Calls of the Ussurian Tube-Nosed Bat (Murina ussuriensis) in the Mating Season

Echolocation Calls Analyzing of Great Evening Bat (ia Io)

Sexual Differences in Morphology and Echolocation Calls in Five Chinese Bat Species