The preliminary study of volumetric CT measurement in the prognostic evaluation of patients with advanced primary liver carcinoma treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

Jia-wen ZHANG,Bin LIU,Yong-qiang YU,Zhang-jun LI,Guo-bing ZHANG,Lin-an DU,De-zhi ZHANG,Zhuang XIONG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2006.11.013
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To analyze those major factors affecting the prognosis of primary liver carcinoma(PLC) patients treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and put emphasis on the value of volumetric CT measurement on the survival rate. Methods: 166 PLC patients treated with TACE were involved in this retrospective study. The hepatic CT of all patients was performed before TACE and in 4 weeks to 2 months after TACE. The tumor volume, tumor to liver volume ratio(TTLVR) before TACE and the tumor regression rate, lipiodol(LP) retention after TACE were measured. The clinical data and general data of the patients were recorded. All patients were followed up by telephone or clinic. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 10.0 statistical software. The prognostic influence of the following parameters was evaluated with univariable analysis. Then multivariate Cox regression analysis model was used to analyze those factors affecting the prognosis to avoid any confounding interaction between them. The cumulative survival time was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognosis influence of the following parameters was analyzed by using of the log-rank tests. Results: The overall cumulative survival rates for 6, 12,24 and 36 months were 78.54% (125/160), 47.23% (62/141), 23.68% (19/123) and 14.09% (5/113) respectively. The median survival time was 12 months. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed 4 parameters were significant prognostic factors. They were TTLVR, portal cancerous thrombus, times of treatment and decrease in AFP concentration after treatment. Survival time of patients of which TTLVR was 0-25%and 50% was more prolonged than that of which TTLVR was 51% -70%, The median survival time was 18 months, 12 months, 7 months respectively. It was not suitable for TACE when TTLVR was more than 70% because its median survival time was only 6 months. Conclusion: (1) Morphologic CT parameters can have objective evaluation to the prognosis factors of PLC with TACE. (2) Volumetric CT technique was a reasonable method to better quantitatively predict the prognosis of patients who underwent TACE. TTLVR was a significant prognosis factor that influenced the survival of PLC treated by TACE.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?