Abstract:CIE has recently recommended a new color appearance model CIECAM16 to replace CIECAM02. It was also intended to recommend a uniform color space (UCS) based on CIECAM16, CIECAM16-UCS, for predicting color difference. However, there was a debate as to whether CIECAM16 can be used to predict color difference, since it takes tristimulus values calculated using the CIE 2 degrees observer as input, while tristimulus values for color difference are usually calculated using the CIE 10 degrees observer, as in the CIEDE2000 formula. Thus, further evidence is needed before CAM16-UCS can be recommended by the CIE as uniform color space. In this paper, we investigate the likely difference in color difference prediction when using CAM16-UCS, and its potential statistical significance. Firstly, the reflectance of each pair of color samples in the visual color difference datasets: BFD-P, Leeds, RIT-DuPont and Witt was generated based on the given tristimulus values. Then, color difference AE2,F and AE10,F, with F being the CAM16-UCS, can be computed under any illuminant using the 2 degrees and 10 degrees observers respectively. Comparison results showed that the difference between AE2,F and AE10,F was not statistically significant. Finally, both AE2,F and AE10,F were used to predict the visual color difference DV and the STRESS values between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV respectively. Statistical tests showed that the differences between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV were not significant. Hence this study shows that CAM16-UCS can be reliably used for predicting color difference. The findings are valuable for CIE to recommend CAM16-UCS as a uniform color space. Currently CIE TC1-98 is investigating the establishment of a new colorimetric system based on cone response tristimulus values LMS. It is expected that the reflectance datasets generated from the color difference datasets will be useful for the evaluation of any new colorimetric system.(c) 2023 Society for Imaging Science and Technology.

Recent Progress in Computing Weighting Tables for Calculating CIE Tristimulus Values

Testing the Accuracy of Methods for the Computation of Cie Tristimulus Values Using Weighting Tables

Interpolation, Extrapolation, and Truncation in Computations of CIE Tristimulus Values

Estimation of Spectral Reflectance of Object Surfaces with the Consideration of Perceptual Color Space

A Novel Method for Computing Optimum Weights for Calculating Cie Tristimulus Values

Revisiting the Weighting Function for Lightness in the CIEDE2000 Colour‐difference Formula

Testing Methods to Estimate Spectral Reflectance Using Datasets under Different Illuminants

Different Matrices for CIECAM02

Accurate Method for Computing Correlated Color Temperature

Toward a Replacement of the CIE Color Rendering Index for White Light Sources

A Revised Formulation Based on CIECAM16 for Cross-media Colour Reproduction Via Real Scene Experiment

CRI2012: A Proposal for Updating the CIE Colour Rendering Index

Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.

Evaluation of Color Difference Prediction with CIECAM16 Using CIE 2-and 10-Degree Observers

Comparison of Real Colour Gamuts Using a New Reflectance Database

Evaluation of Performance of Twelve Color-Difference Formulae Using Two NCSU Experimental Datasets.

Extension of CIE Whiteness Metric under Different Illuminants

The New Process of Measuring Method for Luminance Contrast under Bright Room Condition

Mathematical Approach for Predicting Non‐negative Tristimulus Values Using the CAT02 Chromatic Adaptation Transform

The Llab Model For Colour Appearance And Colour Difference Evaluation

Development of the Ies Method for Evaluating the Color Rendition of Light Sources